Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

Sonicwall VPNs and Shoretel Phone systems in remote offices

Posted on 2014-04-08
4
Medium Priority
?
626 Views
Last Modified: 2014-04-26
I would like a bit of guidance for my current senario, to find the most efficient setup for managebility.

Site A (HQ - alternate route to data center))
Site B (Datacenter where phone infrastructure is located)
Sites 1-66 (remote offices)

Currently there are sites 1 through 66 have two site to site vpns set up. One to Site A and one to Site B. Site A also has a site to site vpn set up to Site B

We will be rolling out shoretel phones to the remote sites 1-66

All remote site phones need to talk to eachother as well and id rather not have to mesh all sites to all sites at each remote site.

Id like to be able to use qos and BWM to prioritize phone traffic.

Anyone with sonicwall and shoretel phone experience have another way for me to configure this senario without having to add 66 address objects to a group at each location? Would route based vpns solve this? and if so how would they be configured at the remote sites? am I going to have 66 new tunnel interfaces on the data center firewall?

Thank you in advance
0
Comment
Question by:Larsen1982
  • 3
4 Comments
 
LVL 15

Expert Comment

by:getzjd
ID: 39988605
Is your voice on a separate vlan and subnet at each site?  For example:  Data for all sites is 10.x.x.x  and voice is 192.168.x.x ?  You could then create generic QoS and BWM rules just based on something like 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0

Speaking from experience ( with ShoreTel) and Sonicwall)though, you will still have the occasional hiccups with service due to the outside forces of the internet acting on your routes and bandwidth.
0
 

Author Comment

by:Larsen1982
ID: 39988649
Most of the remote offices are small and don't have managed switches or vlans. At the datacenter the phone system is on it's own interface.

I could probably do the same in the remote offices and give the phones their own subnet/interface but I believe only half of the sites have an open sonicwall port.
0
 

Accepted Solution

by:
Larsen1982 earned 0 total points
ID: 40013900
Route based VPNs was what I was looking for. After some testing it is good to go, and I only have to change the site to site vpns to tunnel interfaces instead of creating a mesh group on each site.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:Larsen1982
ID: 40024341
My own testing and research resolved this solution.
0

Featured Post

Nothing ever in the clear!

This technical paper will help you implement VMware’s VM encryption as well as implement Veeam encryption which together will achieve the nothing ever in the clear goal. If a bad guy steals VMs, backups or traffic they get nothing.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This article will inform Clients about common and important expectations from the freelancers (Experts) who are looking at your Gig.
This month, Experts Exchange’s free Course of the Month is focused on CompTIA IT Fundamentals.
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
This video gives you a great overview about bandwidth monitoring with SNMP and WMI with our network monitoring solution PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg). If you're looking for how to monitor bandwidth using netflow or packet s…
Suggested Courses

926 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question