?
Solved

Sonicwall VPNs and Shoretel Phone systems in remote offices

Posted on 2014-04-08
4
Medium Priority
?
638 Views
Last Modified: 2014-04-26
I would like a bit of guidance for my current senario, to find the most efficient setup for managebility.

Site A (HQ - alternate route to data center))
Site B (Datacenter where phone infrastructure is located)
Sites 1-66 (remote offices)

Currently there are sites 1 through 66 have two site to site vpns set up. One to Site A and one to Site B. Site A also has a site to site vpn set up to Site B

We will be rolling out shoretel phones to the remote sites 1-66

All remote site phones need to talk to eachother as well and id rather not have to mesh all sites to all sites at each remote site.

Id like to be able to use qos and BWM to prioritize phone traffic.

Anyone with sonicwall and shoretel phone experience have another way for me to configure this senario without having to add 66 address objects to a group at each location? Would route based vpns solve this? and if so how would they be configured at the remote sites? am I going to have 66 new tunnel interfaces on the data center firewall?

Thank you in advance
0
Comment
Question by:Larsen1982
  • 3
4 Comments
 
LVL 15

Expert Comment

by:getzjd
ID: 39988605
Is your voice on a separate vlan and subnet at each site?  For example:  Data for all sites is 10.x.x.x  and voice is 192.168.x.x ?  You could then create generic QoS and BWM rules just based on something like 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0

Speaking from experience ( with ShoreTel) and Sonicwall)though, you will still have the occasional hiccups with service due to the outside forces of the internet acting on your routes and bandwidth.
0
 

Author Comment

by:Larsen1982
ID: 39988649
Most of the remote offices are small and don't have managed switches or vlans. At the datacenter the phone system is on it's own interface.

I could probably do the same in the remote offices and give the phones their own subnet/interface but I believe only half of the sites have an open sonicwall port.
0
 

Accepted Solution

by:
Larsen1982 earned 0 total points
ID: 40013900
Route based VPNs was what I was looking for. After some testing it is good to go, and I only have to change the site to site vpns to tunnel interfaces instead of creating a mesh group on each site.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:Larsen1982
ID: 40024341
My own testing and research resolved this solution.
0

Featured Post

The new generation of project management tools

With monday.com’s project management tool, you can see what everyone on your team is working in a single glance. Its intuitive dashboards are customizable, so you can create systems that work for you.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This program is used to assist in finding and resolving common problems with wireless connections.
This article is in regards to the Cisco QSFP-4SFP10G-CU1M cables, which are designed to uplink/downlink 40GB ports to 10GB SFP ports. I recently experienced this and found very little configuration documentation on how these are supposed to be confi…
Monitoring a network: why having a policy is the best policy? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the enormous benefits of having a policy-based approach when monitoring medium and large networks. Software utilized in this v…
Michael from AdRem Software explains how to view the most utilized and worst performing nodes in your network, by accessing the Top Charts view in NetCrunch network monitor (https://www.adremsoft.com/). Top Charts is a view in which you can set seve…

601 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question