Solved

EXISTS with AND/OR is killing me softly ....

Posted on 2014-04-14
6
128 Views
Last Modified: 2014-04-19
I am using SQL Server 2008 R2. I have an EXISTS with an OR EXISTS... When I use either one by itself, it takes less than a second. But when the two are together as an OR, it takes 54 seconds to run. Here is the clause that's killing me:

 AND ( 
  EXISTS ( 
 select 1 
 from EmployeeUnitJobTypeUnitView 
    INNER JOIN Unit ON Unit.UnitId = EmployeeUnitJobTypeUnitView.UnitId  
  where EmployeeUnitJobTypeUnitView.EmployeeId = Employee.EmployeeId 
      AND Unit.StateCode  
 IN (219) 
 )  
 OR EXISTS ( 
 select 1 
 from EmployeeAccessZoneDistrictUnitView 
    INNER JOIN Unit ON Unit.UnitId = EmployeeAccessZoneDistrictUnitView.UnitId  
  where EmployeeAccessZoneDistrictUnitView.EmployeeId = Employee.EmployeeId 
      AND Unit.StateCode 
 IN (219) 
 )  

Open in new window


Am I doing something wrong on my AND/OR?

BTW, this query, when completed, returns 1 row. The top half returns one row, the second have returns 0 rows.

thanks!
P.S. Just for kicks I also tried an IN and it gives the same amount of time:

AND 
 ( 
  Employee.EmployeeId IN  
    (Select EmployeeId from EmployeeUnitJobTypeUnitView 
    INNER JOIN Unit ON Unit.UnitId = EmployeeUnitJobTypeUnitView.UnitId  
      AND Unit.StateCode  
 IN (219) )
 OR 
  Employee.EmployeeId IN  
    (Select EmployeeId from EmployeeAccessZoneDistrictUnitView  
    INNER JOIN Unit ON Unit.UnitId = EmployeeAccessZoneDistrictUnitView.UnitId  
      AND Unit.StateCode 
 IN (219) )
 ) 

Open in new window

0
Comment
Question by:Starr Duskk
  • 5
6 Comments
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:Starr Duskk
ID: 40000492
Additional information:

Just to show stuff at the top and an entire query, this simple one (without further AND clauses for filtering), took 2:33. It returns 3 rows:

/* exists */

SELECT Distinct Employee.EmployeeId
FROM Employee 
 where 
 Employee.ClientId = 1  
 
 AND ( 
  EXISTS ( 
 select 1 
 from EmployeeUnitJobTypeUnitView 
    INNER JOIN Unit ON Unit.UnitId = EmployeeUnitJobTypeUnitView.UnitId  
  where EmployeeUnitJobTypeUnitView.EmployeeId = Employee.EmployeeId 
      AND Unit.StateCode  
 IN (219) 
 )  
 OR EXISTS ( 
 select 1 
 from EmployeeAccessZoneDistrictUnitView 
    INNER JOIN Unit ON Unit.UnitId = EmployeeAccessZoneDistrictUnitView.UnitId  
  where EmployeeAccessZoneDistrictUnitView.EmployeeId = Employee.EmployeeId 
      AND Unit.StateCode 
 IN (219) 
 )  
 )  

Open in new window

0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:Starr Duskk
ID: 40000493
This query, with a FULL OUTER JOIN and a coalesce took less than a second and returns the same 3 rows:

SELECT Distinct COALESCE(table1.EmployeeId, table2.EmployeeId) AS EmployeeId
from 
(SELECT Distinct Employee.EmployeeId
FROM Employee
 where 
 Employee.ClientId = 1  
 AND 
  EXISTS ( 
 select 1 
 from EmployeeUnitJobTypeUnitView 
    INNER JOIN Unit ON Unit.UnitId = EmployeeUnitJobTypeUnitView.UnitId  
  where EmployeeUnitJobTypeUnitView.EmployeeId = Employee.EmployeeId 
      AND Unit.StateCode  
 IN (219) 
 )
 ) AS TABLE1
 FULL OUTER JOIN (
  SELECT Distinct Employee.EmployeeId
FROM Employee
 where 
 Employee.ClientId = 1  

 AND EXISTS ( 
 select 1 
 from EmployeeAccessZoneDistrictUnitView 
    INNER JOIN Unit ON Unit.UnitId = EmployeeAccessZoneDistrictUnitView.UnitId  
  where EmployeeAccessZoneDistrictUnitView.EmployeeId = Employee.EmployeeId 
      AND Unit.StateCode 
 IN (219) 
 )  
 )  table2 ON
    table2.Employeeid = table1.Employeeid
ORDER BY
    Employeeid

Open in new window

0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:Starr Duskk
ID: 40000504
Oh, and you might ask, "Well, why don't you just use the FULL OUTER JOIN?"

Because when building this query based on search/filter values, I could have a lot of these AND EXISTS/OR EXISTS on various tables. (Six to be exact.)

So not sure how I would pull that off with 6 different ones versus 6 different ones. Because this AND/OR has to filter, then this next AND/OR has to filter, etc.

thanks.
0
Microsoft Certification Exam 74-409

Veeam® is happy to provide the Microsoft community with a study guide prepared by MVP and MCT, Orin Thomas. This guide will take you through each of the exam objectives, helping you to prepare for and pass the examination.

 
LVL 70

Assisted Solution

by:Éric Moreau
Éric Moreau earned 500 total points
ID: 40000644
Instead of doing a OR, can't you just UNION Your 2 queries?
0
 
LVL 2

Accepted Solution

by:
Starr Duskk earned 0 total points
ID: 40000699
Thanks for the suggestion..

I think I just figured it out though. If I create a view with my coalesce, I can use it in my queries and it is zipping fast and I don't have to worry about building it as I build my query.

thanks!
0
 
LVL 2

Author Closing Comment

by:Starr Duskk
ID: 40010170
figured it out.
0

Featured Post

Best Practices: Disaster Recovery Testing

Besides backup, any IT division should have a disaster recovery plan. You will find a few tips below relating to the development of such a plan and to what issues one should pay special attention in the course of backup planning.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

In this article I will describe the Copy Database Wizard method as one possible migration process and I will add the extra tasks needed for an upgrade when and where is applied so it will cover all.
JSON is being used more and more, besides XML, and you surely wanted to parse the data out into SQL instead of doing it in some Javascript. The below function in SQL Server can do the job for you, returning a quick table with the parsed data.
Via a live example, show how to extract insert data into a SQL Server database table using the Import/Export option and Bulk Insert.
Via a live example, show how to shrink a transaction log file down to a reasonable size.

770 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question