• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 389
  • Last Modified:

Advice on using a NAS as an alternative to a server

im currently running a sbs 2003 server which needs replaced as it is very old
i mainly use server as storage and i have exchange running
i was considering replacing the server with a NAS box
i was thinking it would be much simpler and much cheaper
i could use something like a sysnology nas box which can provide dhcp ftp etc
and switch my 8 exchange users to office 365
whats peoples thoughts on this or would i be better of with a server
the only downside to this would be security and no ntfs permissions etc
0
dougdog
Asked:
dougdog
  • 4
  • 3
1 Solution
 
Tony GiangrecoCommented:
0
 
Cris HannaCommented:
You pretty much answered your own question.  With the NAS you get very little control over who can access what unless AD is in place.

For that number of users you should consider Windows Server Essential 2012 R2
0
 
dougdogAuthor Commented:
does it include exchange
0
Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
Cris HannaCommented:
No.  You can still buy SBS 2011 which is the last version that includes Exchange.  You could install on new hardware yourself.

But Essential 2012r2 integrates with O365
0
 
dougdogAuthor Commented:
From a performance point of view and storage
would read / writes be much better using a server for storage  rather than a nas
0
 
Cris HannaCommented:
There is no real answer to that.  
Depends on network speed, depends on the drives in the server, depends on the speed of the drives in the NAS, depends on how the nas is connected, depends on drive conttoller.
Lots of variables.  For 8 users all with gigabit NICs and a Gigabit NICs, you'd have to have a pretty huge difference in the types of drives in the server vs the NAS to see any real performance issues
0
 
dougdogAuthor Commented:
so the best solution going forward is still a server then?
0
 
Cris HannaCommented:
If you have business work environment, where access to files must be granted on a user by user basis...Then active directory and NTFS permissions is a must.

But that doesn't mean you have to have an onsite server...Microsoft Azure can now do AD and you could put all your data in the cloud, with some local storage incase the net is down
0

Featured Post

Problems using Powershell and Active Directory?

Managing Active Directory does not always have to be complicated.  If you are spending more time trying instead of doing, then it's time to look at something else. For nearly 20 years, AD admins around the world have used one tool for day-to-day AD management: Hyena. Discover why

  • 4
  • 3
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now