Solved

SQL Update lines in PK

Posted on 2014-04-22
4
275 Views
Last Modified: 2014-04-22
In my table the PK is ORDER_NUMBER,LINE_NUMBER. I have routine that will insert a line in between other lines. So if the user wants to insert a new line 10 the below will run. I am curious as to why this works.
update ORDLINES
set LINE_NUMBER = LINE_NUMBER + 1
where ORDER_NUMBER=1000  and LINE_NUMBER >= 10

How does SQL number to go to the last line and increment that number and then work backwards? If it did not do that then there would be a PK duplicate record violation. Is there a better more proper way to accomplish this? In the sp I pass down the value of order and line numbers.
0
Comment
Question by:rwheeler23
  • 2
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 6

Accepted Solution

by:
Dulton earned 500 total points
ID: 40015895
How does SQL number to go to the last line and increment that number and then work backwards? If it did not do that then there would be a PK duplicate record violation. Is there a better more proper way to accomplish this? In the sp I pass down the value of order and line numbers.


Looks good to me.

There isn't a duplicate PK record violation because a couple things:
1. you enter this SP with no duplicates, as constrained by your PK of Order_Number,Line_number.
2. you're incrementing all Line numbers 1, for all records which are line_number >= 10

this means that Order_number 1 has line numbers
1, 4, 7, 9,10,11,12,13,14

when you add 1 to every one over or equal to 10 you get:
1, 4, 7, 9,11,12,13,14,15



-Now, if you would subtract 1 rather than add 1 -or- add 1 where line_number is <= 10, you may very well throw PK constraint errors.
0
 

Author Comment

by:rwheeler23
ID: 40016333
Interesting. I would think it would try to update line 10 to line 11 and then bump into a duplicate. So it looks like it updates 15 to 16, 14 to 15, 13 to 14, 12 to 13, 11 to 12 and finally 10 to 11 leaving 10 available which I create at the very end.
0
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:Dulton
ID: 40016402
Yeah, as long as it's all contained within the same DML statement and you do your insert afterward, the way you're going about it, I don't see any primary key violations.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:rwheeler23
ID: 40016450
Thanks for the insight!
0

Featured Post

NAS Cloud Backup Strategies

This article explains backup scenarios when using network storage. We review the so-called “3-2-1 strategy” and summarize the methods you can use to send NAS data to the cloud

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Audit has been really one of the more interesting, most useful, yet difficult to maintain topics in the history of SQL Server. In earlier versions of SQL people had very few options for auditing in SQL Server. It typically meant using SQL Trace …
How to leverage one TLS certificate to encrypt Microsoft SQL traffic and Remote Desktop Services, versus creating multiple tickets for the same server.
This video shows how to use Hyena, from SystemTools Software, to bulk import 100 user accounts from an external text file. View in 1080p for best video quality.
Finds all prime numbers in a range requested and places them in a public primes() array. I've demostrated a template size of 30 (2 * 3 * 5) but larger templates can be built such 210  (2 * 3 * 5 * 7) or 2310  (2 * 3 * 5 * 7 * 11). The larger templa…

777 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question