Want to win a PS4? Go Premium and enter to win our High-Tech Treats giveaway. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

Exchange 2003 Cals needed for Private or Public mail-enable

Posted on 2014-04-28
6
Medium Priority
?
305 Views
Last Modified: 2014-05-27
Hi,
Can you clarify all the pros and cons between using a private mailbox for a generic group or a mail enable folder public folder in Exchange 2003.
I know that you need to have cals for a private mailbox...
0
Comment
Question by:philjans
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 37

Assisted Solution

by:Jamie McKillop
Jamie McKillop earned 750 total points
ID: 40027758
Hello,

CALs are not assigned per mailbox, they are assigned per user. You need the same number of CALs whether you choose to use a mailbox or public folder. Which you choose to use depends on a number of factors. I would need to know your exact use case to make a recommendation.

-JJ
0
 
LVL 63

Accepted Solution

by:
Simon Butler (Sembee) earned 750 total points
ID: 40027762
Exchange 2003 CALs are pretty easy - user = CAL.
Therefore if you are using shared mailboxes then you don't need a CAL.
Not that you can buy CALs any longer for Exchange 2003.

Exchange 2003 Public Folder is pretty much one way traffic. If you want to be able to have sent items stored for the folder, switch to a mailbox.

Simon.
0
 

Author Comment

by:philjans
ID: 40027771
But to create a shared mailbox in 2003, you need to create a user for this so that raise your number of user call? Like if I need a Accounting mailbox, you need to create a user name Accounting? So there you need a cal more.
0
Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
LVL 37

Expert Comment

by:Jamie McKillop
ID: 40027787
CALs are not assigned per AD user account. They are assigned per real human "user".

-JJ
0
 

Author Comment

by:philjans
ID: 40027851
How would they count "real human user" to see if we are compliant (always for 2003)?
0
 
LVL 37

Expert Comment

by:Jamie McKillop
ID: 40027858
If you were ever audited, they would look at the number of employees you have on staff, contractors who have access to your systems, etc. For the most part, software licensing is on the honor system.

-JJ
0

Featured Post

How to Use the Help Bell

Need to boost the visibility of your question for solutions? Use the Experts Exchange Help Bell to confirm priority levels and contact subject-matter experts for question attention.  Check out this how-to article for more information.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

I don't pretend to be an expert at this, but I have found a few things that are useful. I hope that sharing them here will help others, so they will not have to face some rather hard choices. Since I felt this to be a topic of enough importance and…
It’s time for spooky stories and consuming way too much sugar, including the many treats we’ve whipped for you in the world of tech. Check it out!
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of configuring their Windows Server 2012 domain controller to synchronize its time with a trusted, external resource. Use Google, Bing, or other preferred search engine to locate trusted NTP …
This Micro Tutorial hows how you can integrate  Mac OSX to a Windows Active Directory Domain. Apple has made it easy to allow users to bind their macs to a windows domain with relative ease. The following video show how to bind OSX Mavericks to …
Suggested Courses

604 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question