Solved

Exchange 2003 Cals needed for Private or Public mail-enable

Posted on 2014-04-28
6
299 Views
Last Modified: 2014-05-27
Hi,
Can you clarify all the pros and cons between using a private mailbox for a generic group or a mail enable folder public folder in Exchange 2003.
I know that you need to have cals for a private mailbox...
0
Comment
Question by:philjans
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 37

Assisted Solution

by:Jamie McKillop
Jamie McKillop earned 250 total points
ID: 40027758
Hello,

CALs are not assigned per mailbox, they are assigned per user. You need the same number of CALs whether you choose to use a mailbox or public folder. Which you choose to use depends on a number of factors. I would need to know your exact use case to make a recommendation.

-JJ
0
 
LVL 63

Accepted Solution

by:
Simon Butler (Sembee) earned 250 total points
ID: 40027762
Exchange 2003 CALs are pretty easy - user = CAL.
Therefore if you are using shared mailboxes then you don't need a CAL.
Not that you can buy CALs any longer for Exchange 2003.

Exchange 2003 Public Folder is pretty much one way traffic. If you want to be able to have sent items stored for the folder, switch to a mailbox.

Simon.
0
 

Author Comment

by:philjans
ID: 40027771
But to create a shared mailbox in 2003, you need to create a user for this so that raise your number of user call? Like if I need a Accounting mailbox, you need to create a user name Accounting? So there you need a cal more.
0
Creating Instructional Tutorials  

For Any Use & On Any Platform

Contextual Guidance at the moment of need helps your employees/users adopt software o& achieve even the most complex tasks instantly. Boost knowledge retention, software adoption & employee engagement with easy solution.

 
LVL 37

Expert Comment

by:Jamie McKillop
ID: 40027787
CALs are not assigned per AD user account. They are assigned per real human "user".

-JJ
0
 

Author Comment

by:philjans
ID: 40027851
How would they count "real human user" to see if we are compliant (always for 2003)?
0
 
LVL 37

Expert Comment

by:Jamie McKillop
ID: 40027858
If you were ever audited, they would look at the number of employees you have on staff, contractors who have access to your systems, etc. For the most part, software licensing is on the honor system.

-JJ
0

Featured Post

Is Your AD Toolbox Looking More Like a Toybox?

Managing Active Directory can get complicated.  Often, the native tools for managing AD are just not up to the task.  The largest Active Directory installations in the world have relied on one tool to manage their day-to-day administration tasks: Hyena. Start your trial today.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Active Directory security has been a hot topic of late, and for good reason. With 90% of the world’s organization using this system to manage access to all parts of their IT infrastructure, knowing how to protect against threats and keep vulnerabil…
A hard and fast method for reducing Active Directory Administrators members.
The basic steps you have just learned will be implemented in this video. The basic steps are shown to configure an Exchange DAG in a live working Exchange Server Environment and manage the same (Exchange Server 2010 Software is used in a Windows Ser…
Exchange organizations may use the Journaling Agent of the Transport Service to archive messages going through Exchange. However, if the Transport Service is integrated with some email content management application (such as an antispam), the admini…

690 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question