Avatar of cslt
cslt
Flag for United States of America asked on

Connecting two HP 5900AF switches together

These are the ports in use on both switches:

Port 1/0/1 - connected to Dell storage (PS 6110)
Port 1/0/17 - connected to Dell storage (PS 4110)
Ports 1/0/33-36 - connected to Dell hosts (R620s)

These are the settings on the ports for both switches:

Port access Vlan 70
Speed 10000
Duplex full
Flow-control
STP service disabled globally


In this current configuration, the storage is protected from a failure at a cable/switch failure.

I need to protect the storage in case of a cable from the host storage card or the port fails.

Is it possible to bond two ports on each switch and create a 20GB uplink? Would this be a trunking config or LACP? Will I need to turn on STP on those ports or will the switch see it as a single port? I am not familiar with Comware CLI; some examples commands would be very helpful.



I do have a ticket in with HP regarding this but they are taking their sweet time.
TCP/IPNetworking ProtocolsNetworkingDell

Avatar of undefined
Last Comment
cslt

8/22/2022 - Mon
tankergoblin

you need to do network teaming in the server and enable lacp in the switch...

if you can also sfp+ tranceiver to do it...
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Miftaul H

Log in or sign up to see answer
Become an EE member today7-DAY FREE TRIAL
Members can start a 7-Day Free trial then enjoy unlimited access to the platform
Sign up - Free for 7 days
or
Learn why we charge membership fees
We get it - no one likes a content blocker. Take one extra minute and find out why we block content.
Not exactly the question you had in mind?
Sign up for an EE membership and get your own personalized solution. With an EE membership, you can ask unlimited troubleshooting, research, or opinion questions.
ask a question
cslt

ASKER
Miftaul,

Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. It looks like I can setup a bridge-aggregation group on both switches, then I have to decide if I want to use LACP for this group. There are no media converters involved. It is just two cat6 cables connecting the switches together. So the risk of cabling errors and configuration errors are none; this points to a static setup. I know agreggation is stable in static mode as well. At this point any feedback regarding static or LACP would be greatly appreciated.
tankergoblin

erm if not mistaken you need 20G and what is the throughput per port of your switch?

let say 1 GB you need 20 port and do you have 20GB for your port in server?

Also you need LACP to make every port as active mode.
Experts Exchange is like having an extremely knowledgeable team sitting and waiting for your call. Couldn't do my job half as well as I do without it!
James Murphy
tankergoblin

another question is you connect this 20GB to your server??

If yes then you need 20GB network card in your server or team it to 20GB
Miftaul H

cslt,

As there is no media converters present, we can go with Static. But I would go for LACP, in case there is a change in the network.

Here is another link on this - Link
cslt

ASKER
The switches are 10Gb. There are 48 ports that are 10Gb (copper) and four ports that are 40Gb SFP+. I am just trying to connect them both via the copper ports; also stacking is not an option.
Get an unlimited membership to EE for less than $4 a week.
Unlimited question asking, solutions, articles and more.
tankergoblin

ok then aggregation or etherchannel will do..
cslt

ASKER
I talked with support and using more than one port will not provide any additional bandwidth. It will just provide redundancy. For now i am going with a single port link. Thanks.