Avatar of Simon
Simon
Flag for Canada asked on

Mailbox Issue & Outlook 2010/13 Rules

Recently I changed the server SPAM filter settings to label spam and place it directly into (employee mailbox) junk-email folder.

I used to have local .pst folders as default and used Outlook rules to move SPAM for me. Now, I have set employee mailboxes as default using active sync. with Exchange 2010.

So far for one of my employees the SPAM (labeled) stays in the Inbox.
For some reason the Outlook rules do not work either to move them to junk-email.

I tested this with both Outlook 2010 and 2013, still the same issue.
Also, recreated local profiles with cached mode disabled, no go.
Is something wrong with this individual mailbox? What can I do at this point?

Thanks.
ExchangeOutlookEmail ClientsWindows NetworkingWindows OS

Avatar of undefined
Last Comment
Simon

8/22/2022 - Mon
Simon Butler (Sembee)

I would be looking at the rules on the mailbox to begin with.
How are you placing the messages in the junk email folder? The usual reason if you can tag the messages is to use a transport rule to set the SCL value to 8 (or whatever you have the antispam settings set to move in to the junk email folder).

Simon.
Simon

ASKER
I currently have the GFI filter set to move tagged spam directly into junk-email.
It works fine for me and other employees, no rules required.
I deleted my Outlook rule after I made changes to anti-spam settings.

However, this one mailbox is not responding to any rules or the recent changes.
I want to avoid to recreate this individual mailbox, instead looking for a different solution.

Maybe something in exchange console that would refresh it and make it work.
Simon

ASKER
I contacted gfi support and asked about the communication between gfi filter and this specific mailbox.
The filter is not placing spam into junk-email folder for that user.

MailEssentials tag the email and put an SCL value on it. The SCL value is read by Exchange and Outlook and processed accordingly.
If it is just one user, that means Outlook is not reading it properly. If it was Exchange it would affect everyone.
Exactly why Outlook is not reading the SCL value I don't know. As long as the just Email filtering is enabled, it should be able to do so.
Experts Exchange is like having an extremely knowledgeable team sitting and waiting for your call. Couldn't do my job half as well as I do without it!
James Murphy
Simon Butler (Sembee)

Can you see the SCL value in the headers of the message?

Simon.
Simon

ASKER
Yes, the GFI filter puts the value of 1 for SPAM to be moved to junk-email.
Exchange server puts the SCL value of 9.

Also, I have two email addresses assigned to this specific mailbox. Employee & HR.
Not sure if this would contribute to my issues.

Thanks.
Simon

ASKER
I found this online which might help ... however, is it possible that I could break something else?
I didn't run these commands, need to install the power-shell and restart my server.
Also, what exactly would I be doing here?

Get fully connected through PowerShell, then execute the following command:
Get-TransportConfig |fl JournalingReportNdrTo
After running above command examine if the affected mailbox where the rules are not working is listed in output of above command.
If yes, then  this is by-design.

To resolve: please perform below steps.
1. Run: Set-TransportConfig –JournalingReportNdrTo “<>”
2. Run: Get-TransportConfig | fl JournalingReportNdrTo*
3. Verify that is JournalingReportNdrTo is empty
Get an unlimited membership to EE for less than $4 a week.
Unlimited question asking, solutions, articles and more.
Simon Butler (Sembee)

I am curious why you think that command would resolve the issue.
I have found a reference to the command that you have posted, but in relation to an issue with journaling to a mailbox that has rules (as you should use a dedicated mailbox for journaling).

Are you using journaling? If not then that command is completely irrelevant.

Simon.
Simon

ASKER
I am not using journaling.
I found this in another "solved topic" on experts exchange.
This person had issues with the mailbox rules not working.

https://www.experts-exchange.com/Software/Office_Productivity/Groupware/Outlook/Q_28058758.html
Simon Butler (Sembee)

How odd. That question doesn't really explain where it has come from either, which would tend to suggest that it might have been something else. It would do no harm to run those commands, but I  would be very surprised if they did anything.

Simon.
All of life is about relationships, and EE has made a viirtual community a real community. It lifts everyone's boat
William Peck
Simon

ASKER
I finally got a chance to look into this issue again and ran the "Get-TransportConfig |fl JournalingReportNdrTo".
No mailbox was listed. Like you said, the command did nothing.
David Johnson, CD

small question, why are you using active sync with o utlook and not using an exchange connection?
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Simon

Log in or sign up to see answer
Become an EE member today7-DAY FREE TRIAL
Members can start a 7-Day Free trial then enjoy unlimited access to the platform
Sign up - Free for 7 days
or
Learn why we charge membership fees
We get it - no one likes a content blocker. Take one extra minute and find out why we block content.
Not exactly the question you had in mind?
Sign up for an EE membership and get your own personalized solution. With an EE membership, you can ask unlimited troubleshooting, research, or opinion questions.
ask a question
Simon

ASKER
The final solution was not provided by any Experts.
Get an unlimited membership to EE for less than $4 a week.
Unlimited question asking, solutions, articles and more.