Hw to influence BGP over EIGRP

I have Routers R1,R2,R3. R1 and R2 are IBGP peers and R3 is EBGP peers with R2 and R1

from R1 I am advertising network 1.1.1.1 and 10.10.10.10  through EIGRP and BGP.
However on R2 I do not see those networks in BGP Routing Table. The same Networks I can see them in R3 BGP Routing table.
I tried to redistribute from R1 the EIGRP with higher metric than BGP, but still cannot see the Networks specified above in the BGP Routing table of R2

R1
router eigrp 1
 network 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0
 network 10.10.10.10 0.0.0.0
 network 172.16.12.0 0.0.0.255
!
router bgp 605
 no synchronization
 bgp log-neighbor-changes
 network 1.1.1.1 mask 255.255.255.255
 network 10.10.10.10 mask 255.255.255.255
 network 172.16.12.0 mask 255.255.255.0
 redistribute eigrp 1 metric 100000
 neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as 605
 no auto-summary

Open in new window


R2
router eigrp 1
 network 2.2.2.2 0.0.0.0
 network 172.16.12.0 0.0.0.255
 network 192.16.23.0
 network 192.16.203.0
!
router bgp 605
 no synchronization
 bgp log-neighbor-changes
 network 2.2.2.2 mask 255.255.255.255
 network 3.3.3.3 mask 255.255.255.255
 network 172.16.12.0 mask 255.255.255.0
 network 192.16.23.0
 network 192.16.203.0
 neighbor 1.1.1.1 remote-as 605
 neighbor 1.1.1.1 update-source Loopback0
 neighbor 1.1.1.1 next-hop-self
 neighbor 3.3.3.3 remote-as 777
 neighbor 3.3.3.3 ebgp-multihop 2
 neighbor 3.3.3.3 update-source Loopback0
 neighbor 3.3.3.3 next-hop-self
 no auto-summary

Open in new window


R3
router eigrp 1
 network 3.3.3.3 0.0.0.0
 network 192.16.23.0
 network 192.16.203.0
!
router bgp 777
 no synchronization
 bgp log-neighbor-changes
 network 20.20.20.0 mask 255.255.255.0
 network 30.30.30.0 mask 255.255.255.0
 network 192.16.23.0
 network 192.16.203.0
 neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as 605
 neighbor 2.2.2.2 ebgp-multihop 2
 neighbor 2.2.2.2 update-source Loopback0
 no auto-summary

Open in new window



R1#sh ip route bgp
Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area 
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
       i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
       ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
       o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, + - replicated route

Gateway of last resort is not set

      20.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
B        20.20.20.0 [200/0] via 2.2.2.2, 00:00:45
      30.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
B        30.30.30.0 [200/0] via 2.2.2.2, 00:00:45

Open in new window


R2#  sh ip route bgp
Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area 
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
       i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
       ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
       o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, + - replicated route

Gateway of last resort is not set

      20.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
B        20.20.20.0 [20/0] via 3.3.3.3, 00:01:20
      30.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
B        30.30.30.0 [20/0] via 3.3.3.3, 00:01:20

Open in new window


 
R3# sh ip route bgp
Codes: L - local, C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area 
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
       i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
       ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
       o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route, + - replicated route

Gateway of last resort is not set

      1.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
B        1.1.1.1 [20/0] via 2.2.2.2, 00:01:54
      2.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
B        2.2.2.2 [20/0] via 2.2.2.2, 00:01:54
      10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
B        10.10.10.0 [20/0] via 2.2.2.2, 00:01:54
      172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
B        172.16.12.0 [20/0] via 2.2.2.2, 00:01:54
R3#

Open in new window

jskfanAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

mikebernhardtCommented:
Do you see those routes in the EIGRP routing table on R2? Do you see them on R2 if you type "show ip bgp"

Remember that IBGP has a AD of 200 while EIGRP is 90. So you will not see IBGP routes if an IGP route is available. But they should show up in show ip bgp
0
jskfanAuthor Commented:
<<<<Do you see those routes in the EIGRP routing table on R2? Do you see them on R2 if you type "show ip bhp">>>>

I do not have the LAB open now but  I am sure the routes show up in EIGRP table on R2.
but they do not show up , when I type show IP bhp on R2. I posted the output above .

the stunning thing is the same routes show up in R3 BGP table when I type show ip BGP  as I posted the output above for R3

As of Administrative Distance, I know that IBGP has 200 and EIGRP is 90, this is why I include the command below on R1:
 redistribute eigrp 1 metric 100000

Regardless of that as I said the routes 1.1.1.1 and 10.10.10.0 still do not show up in BGP table of R2 but show up in BGP table of R3, even though R3 is connected to R2 and not to R1.
0
jskfanAuthor Commented:
the topology :
bgpp
0
Ultimate Tool Kit for Technology Solution Provider

Broken down into practical pointers and step-by-step instructions, the IT Service Excellence Tool Kit delivers expert advice for technology solution providers. Get your free copy now.

mikebernhardtCommented:
"sho ip bgp" is completely different from "show ip route bgp." It doesn't matter if you redistributed the routes into BGP. "Show ip route bgp" shows you the bgp routes that are in the routing table, and IBGP routes will NEVER show up in the routing table if there is an equivalent EIGRP route there.
0
jskfanAuthor Commented:
redistribute eigrp 1 metric 100000

I guess the command above will still keep the Administrative Distance of EIGRP to 90
metric will just change the cost, I believe
0
mikebernhardtCommented:
The above just puts the EIGRP routes into BGP. So "show ip route bgp" will not show you bgp routes because all that's doing is giving you the subset of routes in the routing table which are bgp, and the router will always prefer EIGRP if it has both options available.

IBGP is usually used to share EBGP routes between 2 routers in the same AS, not to route traffic between them. The router will not advertise BGP routes anyway unless there is an underlying IGP route so you will nearly always have both. If you see the EBGP routes on both routers, it's working as it should.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
jskfanAuthor Commented:
I will go back to the LAB later and try your approach, then post a question if I need to.
Thank you !!
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Routers

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.