Question about Exchange 2013 Failover

Hi guys.

I will be carrying out the first Failover testing since implementation of DAG and HA for our Exchange 2013 CU1 Server. I plan on following the steps from this website:

http://msexchangeguru.com/2013/01/17/e2013-dag/

In this documentation, he suggested we kill the Microsoft.Exchange.Store.Worker process then check the mailbox status to see if the failover was successful. That is all well and good. What he left out is:

1. What happens when I start the Microsoft.Exchange.Store.Worker service back on on CONTOSO1? Will it revert back to the CONTOSO1 database, or do I have to manually perform a switchover using the "Activate" feature on Exchange Control Panel?
2. In his example, the "ContentIndexState" goes to a "Failed" state after performing the failover. Does this fixes itself? Do I have to wait for ContentIndexState to be back to "Healthy" state before manually performing a switchover?

For example purposes, my first server and Active database is CONTOSO1, second server and passive database is CONTOSO2, Database name is CONTOSODB1, DAG name is CONTOSODAG1 and Witness server is CONTOSOWITNESS1. Both CONTOSO1 and CONTOSO2 are CAS and MB.

Thanks,

Rod
LVL 3
Rodrigo Costa dos PrazeresNetwork AdministratorAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Simon Butler (Sembee)ConsultantCommented:
Exchange doesn't fail back on its own.
The only way it would fail back is if something happens to the now active server, so another failover event occurred. If you want to switch servers without triggering a failover, then you have to use the activate database command.

The content index state should be sorted out on its own. It isn't usually something I have worried about.

Simon.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Rodrigo Costa dos PrazeresNetwork AdministratorAuthor Commented:
Great answer as usual, thanks Simon.

One other question, and I am happy to open another thread if it may be. I've inherited this config and first time working with DAG and HA.

Can you confirm that the namespace (let's call it mail.contoso.com) should be resolving to to the Cluster IP address, when pinging internally?

The setup has no hardware load balancer, and the way the system was setup was with Failover Cluster Manager (Cluster name CONTOSODAG01).

I've performed the failover test just before and realized Outlook lost connectivity when I switched the first server off. The moment I changed the DNS record so mail.contoso.com points to the cluster IP it reconnected fine and I could see it was connected to the second server.

Can you confirm this is a supported scenario? And that once I implement CU5 (it is currently with CU1) this will not stop working because of some changes that were introduced?

Thanks
0
Simon Butler (Sembee)ConsultantCommented:
I have seen the configuration you have described done before, but it isn't correct or supported.
The IP address of the DAG (cluster) should be unique to that, nothing else. I expect those who have it configured that way have done so for the same reason you have - as it appears to work for client failover.
While it may work, it only does so because you have both roles on the same machine. Ideally you should have a load balancer in place.

Simon.
0
Problems using Powershell and Active Directory?

Managing Active Directory does not always have to be complicated.  If you are spending more time trying instead of doing, then it's time to look at something else. For nearly 20 years, AD admins around the world have used one tool for day-to-day AD management: Hyena. Discover why

Rodrigo Costa dos PrazeresNetwork AdministratorAuthor Commented:
Is there a compatible software based load balancer I could use? I read that I can't use NLB. Both servers sits on a data centre and adding a hardware load balancer is impossible.
0
MAS (MVE)EE Solution GuideCommented:
Please check this. You can have a KEMP virtual appliance for load balancing. You need a VM for this.
http://kemptechnologies.com/latam/reviews/ms-exchange-2013-useful-blog-post-about-load-balancing-2013-vs-2010
0
Simon Butler (Sembee)ConsultantCommented:
Almost all of the load balancer vendors have virtual appliance versions of their products. Kemp and Jetnexus do, as I am running them both at home.

Disclaimer - both Kemp and Jetnexus have given me NFR copies of their products to use.

Simon.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Exchange

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.