Hosts not seeing the same data on Equallogic SAN

I have a strange issue with my two Dell EqualLogic ps5000 sans and two Dell R710's running Server 2012 R2.

I have set up the two SANs in a cluster, set up a pool with 3 volumes, and presented the volumes to my two windows servers with iSCSI, status shows "connected" in the iSCSI manager.  I have installed the latest Dell Host Integration Toolkit v4.7 to make the software compatible with Server 2012 R2.  The SAN HQ software is also installed.

The volumes are seen normally in disk management and I have formatted them with NTFS using a long format.

The issue that I am having is that when I make a folder and save a file within it, only the server that made the file is able to see it.  The other server looking at the same volume (with the same drive letter assigned) cannot see the file.  When I reboot the servers they are able to see the new files but any new ones are not showing up dynamically.

I also get a message about the recycle bin on drive <x:> is corrupted for each volume.  I tried setting full access NTFS permissions to my account at the root level of the volume I am testing on but still get the error each time I open it in windows explorer. Event log shows this: "A corruption was discovered in the file system structure on volume <X>:. The exact nature of the corruption is unknown.  The file system structures need to be scanned online."

I have also found where the option to "allow simultaneous connections from initiators with different IQNs" can be set on the SANs and it is enabled.

Any help would be appreciated, hopefully someone has run into this issue before and can shed some light on it.  Please let me know if you require any more information from me.

Thank you!
bobbailey22Asked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Cliff GaliherCommented:
Unless you set up a Cluster Shared Volume (which for file services is not always wise) you can't share a volume with more than one windows node in a cluster simultaneously. Windows clusters are active/passive, not active/active. By allowing both nodes to connect to your volume via iSCSI, you will see anomalies like you described and will get data corruption. Your implementation is wrong.
0
Max SandoStorage EngineerCommented:
Seconded, it sounds like your windows boxes are separate. You can not run iSCSI the way you described. Why are you trying to host it out in this manner? What kind of data are you putting on this volume?
0
bobbailey22Author Commented:
Thanks for your responses. I am going to be setting up a failover cluster on the windows boxes but have not done so yet.  It sounds like I will need to do that first.  What we would like to accomplish is having two (or more) separate web servers and SQL servers hosting the data on the same storage location.  We already have a load balancer that shuttles web traffic between the web servers.  

That way when we make a change or publish code it only needs to be done in one location.  If one server goes down the system stays up.  There may be more I need to discuss with our developers on the logistics of the IIS/SQL portion but that is the end goal.

Web Server 1
                        >  (central SAN storage for SQL & Web data)
WebServer 2

Thanks again for your comments and help.
0
Creating Active Directory Users from a Text File

If your organization has a need to mass-create AD user accounts, watch this video to see how its done without the need for scripting or other unnecessary complexities.

Cliff GaliherCommented:
For failover, that's possible. You just don't attach both nodes to the same iSCSI target at the same time. You create the cluster and one node "owns" the storage and is attached. The passive node is in a detached state. In the event of a failure, the passive node will attach at that point.

For load balancing, that requires a completely different architecture that is beyond the scope of a simple EE question, but it doesn't change the answer that two windows machines CANNOT be attached to the same iSCSI target at the same time.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
bobbailey22Author Commented:
OK sounds good, I will set up the cluster and see how that goes.  I will leave the request open for another week or so in case there are any follow up questions related to the original issue.

thanks again!
0
bobbailey22Author Commented:
It looks like in server 2012 there is a technology called Cluster Shared Volume that allows the SAN storage to be shared and accessed by multiple servers at the same time.  I am reading up on it but it sounds like it would accomplish my original task of sharing the storage between servers.  Is there anything I am missing about that technology?
0
Gerald ConnollyCommented:
CSV was suggested by Cliff in his first post.

For a shared volume you need to have some kind of arbitration software otherwise writes from one node will write over writes from the other, thereby causing file system corruption.
0
bobbailey22Author Commented:
Thanks everyone, that points me in the right direction.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Windows Networking

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.