Reverse DNS issues but related to Cisco ASA Firewall

So I have recently upgraded my Exchange server from 2003 to 2010 and mail seems to be flowing perfectly however the reverse DNS doesn't work

In my firewall (cisco asa) I have the following NAT configuration for Inside network:

Static - Source (192.168.1.8) - Interface (Outside - 178.10.123.123) - Address (Webmail = 178.10.123.30)

With this NAT rule I can run ActiveSync, Webmail, etc.. all from outside of the network however my Reverse DNS doesn't work but if I change it too:

Static - Source (192.168.1.8) - Interface (Outside - 178.10.123.123) - Address (reverse dns = 178.10.123.254)

Everything works like a charm for Reverse DNS but now my Webmail and ActiveSync no longer work from outside.

If I try to create 2 of those NATS one for webmail and one for reverse it tells me that "an overlapping error occurred and cannot be completed"

Before on my old server I had OWA and Exchange on two separate boxes, but now that there all on one box I cannot figure this out.

Thank you for all your help
Neogeo147IT Systems AdminAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

MattCommented:
Do you have anything logged on ASA when you try to do reverse DNS?

Try to do reverse DNS and be at the same time connected to ASA box... Submit logg here, so we can see where is the catch...
0
rauenpcCommented:
It would be helpful to get a scrubbed config. Also, inbound nat rules don't necessarily mean that the outbound traffic will use the same IP address. I would hop on the server and go to a site like www.ipchicken.com or something that shows your external IP address and you may find that outbound traffic uses a different public IP than the inbound traffic.
0
Neogeo147IT Systems AdminAuthor Commented:
Ok so I got it fixed

First I had to create a Static NAT rule with the following:

Original:

Interface = Inside

Source = 192.168.1.8

Translated:

Interface = Outside

Use IP address = 178.10.123.30

Enable PAT:

TCP

Original Port = 443

Translated Port = 443

Then I created another Static NAT rule with the exact same settings as above except for the PAT ports = 80

Then I had to create a Dynamic Policy NAT rule with the following:

Interface = Inside

Source = 192.168.1.0/24

Destination = any

service = tcp/smtp

Translated from global pool of dynamic translation:

Interface = Outside

Addresses Pool = 178.10.123.254

Now everything works perfectly
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Neogeo147IT Systems AdminAuthor Commented:
I fixed this myself, this is the correct way in making it so you can receive mail to your Barracuda spam and virus firewall and be able to send out on another public IP with Reverse DNS working perfectly
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Hardware Firewalls

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.