Still celebrating National IT Professionals Day with 3 months of free Premium Membership. Use Code ITDAY17

x
?
Solved

Increasing DHCP IP addresses to an existing LAN

Posted on 2014-07-30
7
Medium Priority
?
900 Views
Last Modified: 2014-07-30
Hi,

I have a LAN with the IP scheme 192.168.5.x connected via MPLS and VPN to multiple other physical sites with individual subnets 192.168.1.x, 192.168.2.x, 192.168.3.x and 192.168.4.x. Subnet mask is 255.255.255.0 for all.

I need to increase available DHCP addresses of just the 5.x network, and allow the other subnets to continue to communicate with IPs on the 5.x network.

Is it better to:

1) change the subnet mask on 5.x to 255.255.255.254? I believe that will then  increase the available DHCP to include 192.168.6.x range as well. Correct?

or

2) Set up a separate 6.x network and tie it into the 5.x (and other subnets) using a router?

I would prefer the first option, but will that have an effect on traffic speed across the LAN and the WAN? Will the 6.x addresses be able to communicate with 1.x and 2.x etc...? Or does it require a routing scheme update on the Cisco site to site routers?

Thanks,
0
Comment
Question by:cfgchiran
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 5
  • 2
7 Comments
 
LVL 20

Accepted Solution

by:
rauenpc earned 2000 total points
ID: 40230154
If you change the subnet mask to 255.255.254.0 (I assume that's what you meant), this would make the subnet contain IP's 192.168.4.0-192.168.5.255, not 192.168.5.0-192.168.6.255. So this would not work.

You will need to setup a separate subnet and do some routing, or change the subnet to 192.168.6.0/23 which would give you 192.168.6.0-192.168.7.255. Either choice requires that the other sites be updated with the new subnet on both MPLS and VPN.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:cfgchiran
ID: 40230243
Thank you for the comment. Why is it not possible to extend 5.1-6.255 with a subnet change? (By making it 192.168.5.0/23)?

Thanks,
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:cfgchiran
ID: 40230261
And yes, I meant 255.255.254.0. :) Thanks.
0
Supports up to 4K resolution!

The VS192 2-Port 4K DisplayPort Splitter is perfect for anyone who needs to send one source of DisplayPort high definition video to two or four DisplayPort displays. The VS192 can split and also expand DisplayPort audio/video signal on two or four DisplayPort monitors.

 
LVL 20

Assisted Solution

by:rauenpc
rauenpc earned 2000 total points
ID: 40230353
It all comes down to the binary of it. A subnet mask is simply a bunch of one's followed by zero's. That is matched up with the IP/subnet. Essentially, the 1's of the subnet mask are the "care bits" and the 0's are the "don't care" bits. We would determine the subnet by matching the "care bits" with all the bits of the IP address in question

11000000 10101000 00000101 00000000 (192.168.5.0)
11111111 11111111 11111110 00000000 (255.255.253.0)
equals a subnet of
11000000 10101000 00000100 00000000 (192.168.4.0)

All of the remaining bits would be host bits, which in this case are the last 9 bits
11000000 10101000 00000100 00000000
If you fill out all the possible combinations of the host bits, you end up with the IP range of 192.168.4.0-192.168.5.255.

If you were to read a book on the topic of subnetting (assuming that the lesson will be binary based and not block based), the author will likely have a much better way of explaining it. It's been a long time since I sat through a subnetting lecture.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:cfgchiran
ID: 40230513
Thank you again.

I have always had some trouble following this binary, and have tried to read up on it on-line just now as well.

I think the part that's confusing for me is if 192.168.4.0/23 192.168.6.0/23 gives you a range of 4.0-5.255 and 6.0-7.255 respectively, why doesn't the same option work for 192.168.5.0/23?

If we were to say 192.168.10/23 would it not be 192.168.1.0-192.168.2.255?
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:cfgchiran
ID: 40230516
I meant 192.168.1.0/23
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:cfgchiran
ID: 40230518
I just used a subnet calculator and I actually do understand it better. So thank you for your help.
0

Featured Post

Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

A common practice in small networks is making file sharing easy which works extremely well when intra-network security is not an issue. In essence, everyone, that is "Everyone", is given access to all of the shared files - often the entire C: drive …
Are you one of those front-line IT Service Desk staff fielding calls, replying to emails, all-the-while working to resolve end-user technological nightmares? I am! That's why I have put together this brief overview of tools and techniques I use in o…
Michael from AdRem Software explains how to view the most utilized and worst performing nodes in your network, by accessing the Top Charts view in NetCrunch network monitor (https://www.adremsoft.com/). Top Charts is a view in which you can set seve…
How to fix incompatible JVM issue while installing Eclipse While installing Eclipse in windows, got one error like above and unable to proceed with the installation. This video describes how to successfully install Eclipse. How to solve incompa…

670 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question