How do I get a Cisco 4507 and a Cisco 2960x to connect with 20GB?

Currently we have one of the fiber ports in the 4507 and one of the fiber ports in the 2960 connected and running at 10 Gig. If we plug in the second module on both of the switches nothing happens. What do we need to do to enable and run the second port so we can get 20GB?
emeschkeAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Don JohnstonInstructorCommented:
The technically correct answer is "you can't".  Since the 2960 doesn't support anything faster than 10g.

But you can connect two 10g links and use etherchannel to create the appearance of a single 20g link.  But keep in mind that a "flow" of traffic will only use one of the links.  This isn't a problem if the reason for doing this is to accommodate multiple flows of traffic. In which case the different flows will be distributed across the two links.

The configuration is relatively straightforward.

First, make sure all the interfaces involved (on both switches) are configured identically. Which means that things like trunking, allowed VLANs, native VLANs, etc. must be the same on all the interfaces. Then:

conf t
int range ten0/1 - 2
 shut
 channel-group 1 mode active
 no shut
end

Open in new window

0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Craig BeckCommented:
Just to add to what Don said, make sure you make any further changes to the operation of the Etherchannel (trunk allowed VLANs, etc) via the Port-Channel interface which will appear after you create the Etherchannel.  If you make changes directly to the interfaces in the Etherchannel they may drop-out and could cause the link to fail.

So, assuming your TenGig interfaces have something like this...
interface TenGigabitEthernet0/1
 switchport
 switchport mode trunk
 switchport trunk native vlan 100
 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-200

Open in new window


...when you do the config as per Don's post you'll automatically get something similar to the following added to your config...
interface Port-Channel1
 switchport
 switchport mode trunk
 switchport trunk native vlan 100
 switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-200

Open in new window

...for example.  If you wanted to change the native VLAN afterwards you'd do it in the Port-Channel interface, not in the TenGig interfaces.
0
emeschkeAuthor Commented:
Finally got a chance to run the commands. I have all the interfaces configured the same, the port channels are all configured identically but I still don't think things are working. If I do a sho int port-channel 2 it only shows one of the ports as a member. I have attached a snip of the putty session. A sho int transceiver shows the second line dark.
Is there something else i need to do?
PortChannel2.JPG
0
Get Cisco Certified in IT Security

There’s a high demand for IT security experts and network administrators who can safeguard the data that individuals, corporations, and governments rely on every day. Pursue your B.S. in Network Operations and Security and gain the credentials you need for this high-growth field.

Craig BeckCommented:
Te3/2 and Te4/2 have problems!

Can you post the configs for each interface, and the PortChannel?
0
emeschkeAuthor Commented:
Here they are.
Channel1.JPG
Channel2.JPG
0
Craig BeckCommented:
Ok so PortChannel2 includes Te3/1 and Te3/2.  We established that Te3/2 has a problem so only one interface will appear active in the PortChannel.  The same can be said for the other PortChannel.

I'd try fixing the links first - chances are the PortChannels will be fine then.
0
Don JohnstonInstructorCommented:
Please post the output of a "show ether summ".
0
emeschkeAuthor Commented:
Here is the result, looks like I have and issue with those channels.
ShowEther.JPG
0
Don JohnstonInstructorCommented:
I would remove the port-channel commands and verify each link is operational (by shutting down one).
0
TimotiStDatacenter TechnicianCommented:
Just an idea for the links: based on the transmit power, any chance we're mixing LX and SX optics here?
Tamas
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Switches / Hubs

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.