UPlinking Network Switches

I have one Cisco SG200-50 Switch 48 10/100/1000 which is the main network switch it is just about full up.  In the back of the building there are multiple systems that need a direct run which is about 100ft run.  As i said before all the switch ports are almost full which is the first issue.  Is there a good way to but another switch maybe a 24 port in the back of the building and uplink them for the best performance.  I do not just want to daisy chain them that is already in place and the network performance through all the hops is very poor.

Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

i can understand that your main switch is connected to your servers. I recommend you do stacking. Im not sure Cisco SG200-50 Switch can do stacking or not.
cameljoe121Author Commented:
IT has 2 Combo Mini-GBIC Ports could I run a cable the 100ft to the GBIC ports would that accomplish the stacking?
i dont think cisco you use has that feature. Maybe is time for you to get better switch. It is good for your expand in the future too.
if you want to keep your switch the only option is connect one of your uplink or downlink to another switch..

if there is no critical system you are running in your network i think you wont feel poor performance.
Bryant SchaperCommented:
Not sure what you are meaning by daisy chaining, if you will only have two switches, they will be daisy chained per say.

TankerGoblin is right, get another switch, can be same model if you want, or a better switch to serve as your core where servers connect, then run one or two Ethernet or fiber if you want to use the gbics, but nothing special to go 100 feet, just use CAT6 ideally, but CAT5e is cheaper and will still be fine.

If it is a single vlan network, nothing special needs to be configured, just connect them, and maybe set the ports to 1000/full.  

Are you seeing performance issues now?  Do you have none cisco switches connected too?  They can cause all sorts of bottle necks if it is just off the shelf cheap stuff.

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Windows Networking

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.