Should non-Christian be permitted position of Ambassador?

Should non-Christian be permitted position of Ambassador?


___________________________________________________
http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/alarms-raised-over-left-leanings-of-religion-ambassador/ [excerpts]
Saperstein would be the “first non-Christian” to hold the post

The White House pointed out that Saperstein also serves on a number of boards, including The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the National Religious Partnership for the Environment.

“How will it be possible for [Rabbi David] Saperstein, who has in the past stood against certain aspects of religious expression in the United States, to promote religious freedom abroad?” asked William Murray of the Religious Freedom Coalition in a report by Andrew Harrod on the coalition website.
LVL 24
SunBowAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Dave BaldwinFixer of ProblemsCommented:
Sounds to me like only agnostics should be nominated.
0
tliottaCommented:
From the link:
Such a position would conflict with many of the Christian churches in America.
The context in the linked article makes me think that "many of the Christian churches in America" do not support any religious freedom that differs from their own positions.

Apparently Rabbi Saperstein could be a good choice.

Tom
0
SunBowAuthor Commented:
*-))
0
Cloud Class® Course: Microsoft Azure 2017

Azure has a changed a lot since it was originally introduce by adding new services and features. Do you know everything you need to about Azure? This course will teach you about the Azure App Service, monitoring and application insights, DevOps, and Team Services.

dhsindyRetired considering supplemental income.Commented:
The question is not his personal beliefs but rather is he neutral in representing the USA when it comes to religious freedom. He is a lawyer and has taught First Amendment rights on the college level. I would say he would be a good choice so long as he doesn't promote his personal views but remains neutral on religious matters.
0
tliottaCommented:
...so long as he doesn't promote his personal views but remains neutral on religious matters.

That's tricky since his views seem to tend to be that individuals should be allowed to make their personal choices, and religious institutions should not force institutional beliefs on the individuals. Isn't that a major point of promoting religious freedom? It seems to me that his personal views are the biggest part of why he was chosen. His views match up with the purpose of the position.

But it hasn't been easy finding explicit examples of his personal views. Almost everything is just other people saying things about his beliefs. Are there good examples of him speaking/writing his views? Or is the purpose of the position something less obvious?

Tom
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
dhsindyRetired considering supplemental income.Commented:
Everybody has been brainwashed (even atheists) into their beliefs.  About all we can hope for is the best available person willing to do the job.

Just because the United States was founded by Christians doesn't mean we are a Christian nation. Read the Constitution and the bill of rights and the Supreme Court judgements. We are a nation of laws - although it is majority rule - we also protect minorities and individuals against the emotions of the majority.
0
SunBowAuthor Commented:
[Abandoned (14 Days)]
0
SunBowAuthor Commented:
[recusing self/asker]

Feel free  to disagree, but my take is unanimity considering question, that EE 'vote'

3-0 in favor of
                          permitting position of Ambassador to non-Christian

Upon closure, rereading a few ,ore times, what stands out to me today is the line: "Almost everything is just other people saying things about his beliefs."

Wondering if person in position should be advocate for anything beyond "service' to country? What form of litmus test, etc. Food for thought for some other day ...
For now, moving on...
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Philosophy / Religion

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.