procmail recipies

is it possible to detect a missing TO 'field' in an email header?
camstutzAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

gheistCommented:
| sed '/^$/q' | grep ^To:\  
(there are two spaces at the end)

Cut headers and look for To:(space) header

btw RFC says From: and Date: are required, and between lines that relayed mail (like all from internet) should have Received: hheader inside
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
camstutzAuthor Commented:
Hello gheist,

I appreciate your help. I am newer to procmail, so I am going to be testing this. My main goal is that we get a lot of blank emails that goes in waves. A quick Google search shows we are not a lone. These emails are literally missing the body, and have no from or to lines in the body It has a delivered-to and return-path field. They also have a non-standard header (in the since that it is missing a lot of the delivery path information and other normally seen fields.

I was hoping to catch something these with a procmail recipe that would look for the absence of these blank emails.
0
camstutzAuthor Commented:
I re-read my initial post... I'm sorry, I wrote it inappropriately... I was meaning missing the to field completely.
0
How do you know if your security is working?

Protecting your business doesn’t have to mean sifting through endless alerts and notifications. With WatchGuard Total Security Suite, you can feel confident that your business is secure, meaning you can get back to the things that have been sitting on your to-do list.

gheistCommented:
You need to set up some greylisting. That forces spammer to use queueing mail server instead of blind script.
Hope this helps
0
camstutzAuthor Commented:
Sorry for the Delay,

Unfortunately, Greylisting isn't an option for me. I was hoping it do it directly in procmail
0
gheistCommented:
Well I have shown you filter for procmail to check for To: header in message body. That answers your question.
Greylisting keeps most of spam out of mailboxes without much load on mailserver (like 2 commands per message with my filter)
0
camstutzAuthor Commented:
Thanks gheist... I do appreciate the greylisting info though, just my superiors do not like the option at this point.
My last question before I award points, is on that sed recipe, do I use the * to start the line?

 * | sed '/^$/q' | grep ^To:\  

If there is an article about this I would be willing to read it.

Thanks
0
gheistCommented:
Yessire....
0
gheistCommented:
I just added some commands that reads to first blank line
then other that checks for to: header
some command tutorials on grep / sed /awk and regular expressions are easy to find on internet....
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
AntiSpam

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.