Best Wifi access point?

Purpose:
- Indoor wifi access for mobile devices, laptops, iPhone, etc.

Requirements:
- PoE so we can put it up in ceiling for best wifi coverage wo/running electrical wiring .
- Radius authentication (since it's the strongest security)
- Documented high throughput even w/several dozen MAC address connections.
- Need a true access point (not a router).

Thanks!
Geoff MillikanAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

pgm554Commented:
There's several options,but the good stuff is from folks like Ruckus,Cisco ,Aruba.
Depends upon your budget.
0
Geoff MillikanAuthor Commented:
Budget is under $300.  Under $200 would be better.  Will probably need to buy 2 (first one for employees on LAN IP address space and the other for guests who will be put on a separate network).
0
Geoff MillikanAuthor Commented:
Where is documentation on why Ruckus, Cisco, Aruba are better than Engenius, Ubiquiti?
0
What were the top attacks of Q1 2018?

The Threat Lab team analyzes data from WatchGuard’s Firebox Feed, internal and partner threat intelligence, and a research honeynet, to provide insightful analysis about the top threats on the Internet. Check out our Q1 2018 report for smart, practical security advice today!

Natty GregIn Theory (IT)Commented:
Cisco WAP121 Wireless-N Access Point with Power over Ethernet
0
Geoff MillikanAuthor Commented:
PGM544: Nice data.  RUCKUS performed well!  Which RUCKUS AP are you recommending we use?  WE have less than 30 devices connecting.

NATTYGREG:  The WAP121 has a 3.1 star rating at Amazon w/twenty-one reviews but the Ubiquiti NSM5 has 4.8 stars w/43 reviews.  So why is the Cisco better than the Ubiquiti?  Don't get me wrong, we have Cisco ASA firewalls here so I understand the Cisco value but seems this WAP might be a bit weak?
0
Natty GregIn Theory (IT)Commented:
You can buy the ubiquiti NSM5 based on research it seems to be a good fit and powerful enough t o get the job done
0
masnrockCommented:
Get Ubiquiti ... I have tried a Cisco WAP121... totally did not work. Connections dropped left and right, but that may have been the environmen I tried it in. Ruckus works great, but can be costly.
0
Darr247Commented:
Nearly half of the 1-star reviewers (click the link[s] on either side of the bar graph to sort the reviews by number of stars) on Amazon say to get the WAP321 instead. Note the K9 suffix mean's it's for FCC land.
0
masnrockCommented:
Even the 321 depends on the environment. I nearly lost a contract using one of those. Cisco could not explain why a Linksys was working better in the office than the WAP321. I like Cisco for a lot of things they make, but access points for small businesses are a mixed bag.
0
Aaron TomoskySD-WAN SimplifiedCommented:
The reason for meraki, Aruba, ruckus, etc are advanced features and density. For 30 devices and the rest of your information given, I would lean toward ubiquity. My first choice with them is the ap-pro if you want 2.4 and 5 ghz. I stay away from long range access points because small mobile devices especially like phones have problems transmitting at distance to long range access points. You can get in a situation where you have good signal, but the ap can't hear you. That said, they work great for laptops with bigger antennas.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Darr247Commented:
If you look up in the trusses at your local Home Depot, you'll likely find similar to these AIR-AP1252AG-A-K9 models (except they use the 'lightweight' LAP units that require a controller) providing bandwidth for the free WiFi and connectivity for their IP phones. For PoE, its PS+injector is the AIR-PWRINJ4.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Wireless Hardware

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.