jskfan
asked on
OSPF DR and BDR
I would like to know in which topology DR/BDR will be formed.
I know that it automatically forms in a Broadcast segment, but I wonder if it means full mesh ?
example:
R1 is connected to R2 and R2 is connect to R3 and R3 is connected back to R1, This is Broadcast segment and the DR/BDR election will occur..
What if :
R1 is connected to R2 and R2 is connect to R3 but R3 is not connected to R1. I believe this is not Broadcast and not full mesh, as such no DR/BDR election...
What if:
R1 is connected to R2 and R2 is connect to R3 and R3 is connected back to R1,and there is another R4 connected only to R1... would R4 participate in DR/BDR elections ?
Thanks
I know that it automatically forms in a Broadcast segment, but I wonder if it means full mesh ?
example:
R1 is connected to R2 and R2 is connect to R3 and R3 is connected back to R1, This is Broadcast segment and the DR/BDR election will occur..
What if :
R1 is connected to R2 and R2 is connect to R3 but R3 is not connected to R1. I believe this is not Broadcast and not full mesh, as such no DR/BDR election...
What if:
R1 is connected to R2 and R2 is connect to R3 and R3 is connected back to R1,and there is another R4 connected only to R1... would R4 participate in DR/BDR elections ?
Thanks
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
<<<if you connect R1 to R2 and R2 to R3, they got to be in different segments, and there will be no DR/BDR.>>>
I need to try it....because in this case R2 will have 2 different interfaces in the same subnet... I do not think it will let you do that...
Can R2 have one interface with 192.168.1.10 and another interface with 192.168.1.20 ??
I need to try it....because in this case R2 will have 2 different interfaces in the same subnet... I do not think it will let you do that...
Can R2 have one interface with 192.168.1.10 and another interface with 192.168.1.20 ??
Is there a diagram somewhere that I missed?
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
Ok...
I did not know that DR/BDR depends also on medium (Ethernet vs serial)
To me point to point means there is no switch or else between the routers...
I did not know that DR/BDR depends also on medium (Ethernet vs serial)
To me point to point means there is no switch or else between the routers...
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
Thank you Guys!
ASKER
the only way I see you can connect 3 or more routers into the same segment is if you use a Switch.
if you connect only R1 to R2, that will be point to point ,regardless if it is serial or Ethernet interface. so there will be no DR/BDR . correct ?
if you connect R1 to R2 and R2 to R3, they got to be in different segments, and there will be no DR/BDR. correct ?
I also want to confirm that DR/BDR not only requires routers to be in the same network segment, but also in the same OSPF area . Correct ?
Thanks