Solved

SQL0338 Error received on query

Posted on 2014-09-19
3
291 Views
Last Modified: 2014-09-19
I have an application executing this query that used to work in iSeries O/S V5R4, but no longer works in V7R1.  I understand IBM made a change to the way they handle joins in versions 6.1 and above, but can't figure out a way to get around the error.  Here is the query:

Select H.PONumber, H.CreationDate, H.BuyerID, H.VendorID,
            H.LDC, V.DBVen_Vendor_VName, Coalesce(DBVLo_Addr1,
            DBVen_Addr1) as DBVen_Addr1, Coalesce(DBVLo_Addr2,
            DBVen_Addr2) as DBVen_Addr2, Coalesce(DBVLo_Addr3,
            DBVen_Addr3) as DBVen_Addr3, Coalesce(DBVLo_Addr4,
            DBVen_Addr4) as DBVen_Addr4, Coalesce(DBVLo_City_Addr5,
            DBVen_City_Addr5) as DBVen_City_Addr5,
            Coalesce(DBVLo_State_Prov, DBVen_State_Prov) as
            DBVen_State_Prov, Coalesce(DBVLo_Postal_Code,
            DBVen_Postal_Code) as DBVen_Postal_Code, S.StatusDescription
            From PMFPOHeader H, PMFPODetails D, PMFPORevision R,
            PMFPOStatus S, DBAPVEN V Left Outer Join DBAPVLo VL On
            VL.DBVLo_Vendor = V.DBVEN_VENDOR and VL.DBVLo_Location_Code
            = H.VendorLocationCode Where H.PONumber = 1000 and D.PONumber
            = 1000 and H.VendorID = V.DBVEN_VENDOR and S.StatusID =
            H.Status Group By H.PONumber, H.CreationDate, H.BuyerID,
            H.VendorID, H.LDC, V.DBVEN_VENDOR_VNAME, VL.DBVLo_ADDR1,
            VL.DBVLo_ADDR2, VL.DBVLo_ADDR3, VL.DBVLo_Addr4,
            VL.DBVLo_City_Addr5, VL.DBVLo_State_Prov,
            VL.DBVLo_Postal_Code, DBVen_ADDR1, DBVen_ADDR2, DBVen_ADDR3,
            DBVen_Addr4, DBVen_City_Addr5, DBVen_State_Prov,
            DBVen_Postal_Code, S.StatusDescription

Ideas?
0
Comment
Question by:JJSystems
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 18

Expert Comment

by:daveslash
ID: 40332999
Ahh yes. I see it. You mixed "old-style" joins with "new style" joins.

old-style = joins using commas
new-style = explicitly using JOIN keyword

convert all your old-style joins to new-style joins and you should be ok.

HTH,
DaveSlash
0
 
LVL 18

Accepted Solution

by:
daveslash earned 500 total points
ID: 40333045
Something like this should work:

Select H.PONumber, 
       H.CreationDate, 
       H.BuyerID, 
       H.VendorID,
       H.LDC, 
       V.DBVen_Vendor_VName, 
       Coalesce(DBVLo_Addr1, DBVen_Addr1) as DBVen_Addr1, 
       Coalesce(DBVLo_Addr2, DBVen_Addr2) as DBVen_Addr2, 
       Coalesce(DBVLo_Addr3, DBVen_Addr3) as DBVen_Addr3, 
       Coalesce(DBVLo_Addr4,
       DBVen_Addr4) as DBVen_Addr4, 
       Coalesce(DBVLo_City_Addr5,
       DBVen_City_Addr5) as DBVen_City_Addr5,
       Coalesce(DBVLo_State_Prov, DBVen_State_Prov) as DBVen_State_Prov, 
       Coalesce(DBVLo_Postal_Code, DBVen_Postal_Code) as DBVen_Postal_Code, 
       S.StatusDescription
  From PMFPOHeader H
  join PMFPODetails D
    on D.PONumber = H.PONumber
  cross join PMFPORevision R
  join PMFPOStatus S
    on S.StatusID = H.Status
  join DBAPVEN V 
    on H.VendorID = V.DBVEN_VENDOR
  Left Outer Join DBAPVLo VL
    On VL.DBVLo_Vendor = V.DBVEN_VENDOR
   and VL.DBVLo_Location_Code = H.VendorLocationCode
 Where H.PONumber = 1000
 Group By H.PONumber,
       H.CreationDate,
       H.BuyerID,
       H.VendorID,
       H.LDC,
       V.DBVEN_VENDOR_VNAME,
       VL.DBVLo_ADDR1,
       VL.DBVLo_ADDR2,
       VL.DBVLo_ADDR3,
       VL.DBVLo_Addr4,
       VL.DBVLo_City_Addr5,
       VL.DBVLo_State_Prov,
       VL.DBVLo_Postal_Code,
       DBVen_ADDR1,
       DBVen_ADDR2,
       DBVen_ADDR3,
       DBVen_Addr4,
       DBVen_City_Addr5,
       DBVen_State_Prov,
       DBVen_Postal_Code,
       S.StatusDescription

Open in new window


I noticed that you didn't specify any join-criteria for table PMFPORevision, I assume you meant for it to be a cross-join.

I find it best to fully enter this century and abandon all old-style joins. They're much "clearer" and easier to code.

HTH,
DaveSlash
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:JJSystems
ID: 40333454
Thank you!
0

Featured Post

DevOps Toolchain Recommendations

Read this Gartner Research Note and discover how your IT organization can automate and optimize DevOps processes using a toolchain architecture.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
grant user read only access to DB2 V 8.02 10 999
Find out which object is not saved 2 182
SAS Email Chart as attachment code 2 288
DB2 - LOG FILES. 4 48
November 2009 Recently, a question came up in the DB2 forum regarding the date format in DB2 UDB for AS/400.  Apparently in UDB LUW (Linux/Unix/Windows), the date format is a system-wide setting, and is not controlled at the session level.  I'm n…
Recursive SQL in UDB/LUW (you can use 'recursive' and 'SQL' in the same sentence) A growing number of database queries lend themselves to recursive solutions.  It's not always easy to spot when recursion is called for, especially for people una…
Along with being a a promotional video for my three-day Annielytics Dashboard Seminor, this Micro Tutorial is an intro to Google Analytics API data.
This Micro Tutorial demonstrates using Microsoft Excel pivot tables, how to reverse engineer competitors' marketing strategies through backlinks.

813 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

12 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now