Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

dfs - distributed file system replication folder question

Posted on 2014-09-22
4
Medium Priority
?
192 Views
Last Modified: 2014-10-06
I have setup DFS replication on both DC at same physical location. ex: share1 on dc1 (primary) replicates to share1 on dc2. both DCs are name server. if both DCs are both on. How do I know exactly which server I am accessing? as it could be either dc1 or dc2
0
Comment
Question by:okamon
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 59

Expert Comment

by:Cliff Galiher
ID: 40338219
Short answer, you don't of both replication targets are also DFS Namespace targets. And, in fact, that would defeat the purpose of DFS-N. If they are on the same physical server and, in fact in most cases at the same site, I see almost no benefit to such a topology. DFS-R is not meant to be a replacement for failover clustering. They serve two different purposes and there is little overlap.
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:Joshua Grantom
ID: 40339069
If you right click on a shared folder that is in a DFS namespace and go to the DFS tab, it will actually tell you which server path is active.
0
 

Author Comment

by:okamon
ID: 40341459
the purpose we setup the replication is to use the dc2 as a backup. so if the dc1 is down we can quickly switch to it. what is the problem of doing this? of course, we are also doing a full server backup to external device.

my plan is to change it as one way replication, so only dc1 replicates to dc2, not 2 way.
0
 
LVL 59

Accepted Solution

by:
Cliff Galiher earned 2000 total points
ID: 40342516
You can do what you want if only one DFS namespace target is enabled. In the event of a failure, you'd have to manually enable the other target. Rather kludgy. If both are enabled, you can't control which reference gets handed out, and conflicts will inevitably occur because file locks do *not* occur at the DFS level. DFS-R isn't one-way, but by disabling a target, you can ensure changes are only happening on one server and would effectively only need to travel one way. But as mentioned above, that requires manual intervention in a failure. So doable? Yes. Is it a cluster replacement? Not even close. Which is what it sounds like you are trying to create.
0

Featured Post

Has Powershell sent you back into the Stone Age?

If managing Active Directory using Windows Powershell® is making you feel like you stepped back in time, you are not alone.  For nearly 20 years, AD admins around the world have used one tool for day-to-day AD management: Hyena. Discover why.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Windows Server 2003 introduced persistent Volume Shadow Copies and made 2003 a must-do upgrade.  Since then, it's been a must-implement feature for all servers doing any kind of file sharing.
High user turnover can cause old/redundant user data to consume valuable space. UserResourceCleanup was developed to address this by automatically deleting user folders when the user account is deleted.
To efficiently enable the rotation of USB drives for backups, storage pools need to be created. This way no matter which USB drive is installed, the backups will successfully write without any administrative intervention. Multiple USB devices need t…
This tutorial will walk an individual through setting the global and backup job media overwrite and protection periods in Backup Exec 2012. Log onto the Backup Exec Central Administration Server. Examine the services. If all or most of them are stop…

916 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question