?
Solved

Hyper-V Server 2012 R2 vs Server 2012 R2 with Hyper-V role resource usage

Posted on 2014-09-25
7
Medium Priority
?
703 Views
Last Modified: 2014-11-12
Let me start off by saying that I am a VMware guy, but am currently looking into the Hyper-V based on the new features, abilities, cost savings in the 2012 version.

I have built out two identical HP blade servers one with Hyper-V server 2012 R2 (Base metal install with sconfig.cmd) and one with Server 2012 R2 and the Hyper-V role installed.

I wanted to run these two machines side by side to see the difference in resource utilization between the full server OS with role and just bare metal hyper-v install. After getting both of the servers built I was pretty surprised to find that there really isnt much difference between the two.

The full server 2012 install took up about 13gb worth of disk space and at idle the server sits right around 1.2 gb of used memory.

The hyper-v r2 server install took up about 8.5 gb worth of disk space and at ide the server is using 2gb of memory.

Now call me crazy but I dont see why a slimmed down bare metal install of Hyper-V should use more memory than the full server OS. Am I missing something here because with the numbers that I am seeing there is really no resource benefit to go to Hyper-V server 2012  R2?

I was thinking this was going to be comparable to an Esxi install where the resource for the hypervisor was basically nothing.

Any help would be appreciated.
0
Comment
Question by:Joseph Daly
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
7 Comments
 
LVL 123

Accepted Solution

by:
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2) earned 1000 total points
ID: 40343874
It's based on the  Windows OS and has far more support for different drivers and hardware than ESXi.

Hence why ESXi has a smaller footprint, in terms of installation and memory usage.

Hyper-V server 2012  R2 is FREE, that's a benefit.

Is this Windows 2012 R2 Core ? (e.g. GUI or no GUI)
0
 
LVL 35

Author Comment

by:Joseph Daly
ID: 40343890
The server 2012 r2 with the hyper-v role installed is not the core install it is the full blown gui install and its still using less memory than the hyper-v r2 server bare metal install.
0
 
LVL 123
ID: 40343910
It would be interested to see, when the GUI is removed e.g. core
0
Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
LVL 35

Author Comment

by:Joseph Daly
ID: 40343949
You think removing the GUI would cause the server to use up more resources? Because thats whats happening super stripped down version of hyper-v is taking more resources than the full blown gui.
0
 
LVL 59

Expert Comment

by:Cliff Galiher
ID: 40343967
Memory usage during a fresh install is higher as optimization routines run. You'll find that, as long as the workloads, drivers, hardware, and VMs are identical, they'll both settle down. Memory usage will be nearly identical as will CPU. The differences come in with disk space and security footprint.
0
 
LVL 35

Author Comment

by:Joseph Daly
ID: 40343982
These machines have been built and running for over a week now Im pretty sure all the optimization routines have been run. These machines have no workload on them and no vms currently strictly the base install.

If the "bare metal" version of hyper-v takes more resources than the full install what is the point? The difference in disk space between the two is 5gb which is negligible. Can you elaborate on the security footprint piece you were talking about?
0
 
LVL 59

Assisted Solution

by:Cliff Galiher
Cliff Galiher earned 1000 total points
ID: 40344006
My inclination is that you have some significant driver differences then which is why I listed all the varietals that can have an impact. When all other parts are equal, installs with the smaller GUI take less memory. I can attest this first-hand.

As far as the security footprint, Google is your friend. This has been the subject of very long technical blog posts that I will not cut and paste in their entirety here. It is the primary reason there is core vs minshell vs full GUi vs desktop experience.
0

Featured Post

When ransomware hits your clients, what do you do?

MSPs: Endpoint security isn’t enough to prevent ransomware.
As the impact and severity of crypto ransomware attacks has grown, Webroot fought back, not just by building a next-gen endpoint solution capable of preventing ransomware attacks but also by being a thought leader.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

The following article is comprised of the pearls we have garnered deploying virtualization solutions since Virtual Server 2005 and subsequent 2008 RTM+ Hyper-V in standalone and clustered environments.
A look into Log Analysis and Effective Critical Alerting.
This Micro Tutorial steps you through the configuration steps to configure your ESXi host Management Network settings and test the management network, ensure the host is recognized by the DNS Server, configure a new password, and the troubleshooting…
How to install and configure Citrix XenApp 6.5 - Part 1. In this video tutorial we have explained step by step installation of Citrix XenApp 6.5 Server on Windows Server 2008 R2 is explained in this video. We have explained the difference between…
Suggested Courses

765 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question