I am looking to replace my dated UTM device. I local vendor is suggesting the SonicWall NSA 220 Series and CDW is suggesting a Fortinet Fortigate 100D.
Our office consists of about 40 users with desktops. We are a BOYD shop so I am sure that there are some cellphones, iPads and other devices hoping on and off our wireless network throughout the day. We also have 5 outside sales guys that use a VPN to get onto our network.
During my research I found the following (however it was a site pushing SonicWalls):
Some reasons why SonicWALL is better:
1. Limited Proxy – based AV Scanning FortiGates using proxy-based AV scanning have file size limitations and performance-limiting intellectual property and hardware. Files larger than the buffer are passed without being scanned or are blocked. SonicWALLs have no such file size limitations.
2. Basic Application Management – SonicWALL's running SonicOS 5.6.4 and later with Application Intelligence, Control and Visualization provide a comprehensive set of application management capabilities. FortiGates are limited to very basic allow, block and log. Also, SonicWALLs have 3x as many application signatures as FortiGates.
3. Inadequate File and Protocol Scanning – FortiGates scan only a portion of each file for malware across just 11 protocols. SonicWALLs scan the entire file over 50+ protocols.
4. Poor Distributed Wireless Functionality – FortiWiFis offer few wireless features. SonicWALLs provide many more such as Lightweight Hotspot Messaging, Wireless Guest Services and others.
5. Costly Central Management – You will need to purchase and run FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer together to get the equivalent features of SonicWALL GMS.
6. No IPv6 or ICSA Enterprise Firewall Certification – While FortiGates may support IPv6, SonicWALL NSA and E-Class NSA Series appliances are IPv6 certified. In addition, SonicWALL is the first network security vendor to receive ICSA Enterprise Firewall certification. Fortinet products have no such certification.
7. Poor Anti-Spam Options – The FortiGate email filter service is limited to three dynamically-updated techniques (IP Reputation, Message body URL check and Message body content signatures). SonicWALL Comprehensive Anti-Spam Service utilizes 3x as many techniques including those.
8. One-way Anti-Spyware Protection – FortiGates monitor only inbound traffic for spyware, not outbound. SonicWALLs monitor and block spyware in both directions.
9. Restricted 3G Availability – Only low-end FortiGates (80 Series and below) have 3G wireless WAN failover. SonicWALL includes 3G across all firewall lines.
10. Lack L2TP Server Support for Handheld Devices – FortiGates lack L2TP Server, so handhelds are unable to connect to the firewall. SonicWALLs include built-in L2TP Server.
I am VERY green when it comes to this stuff so I am turning to you for suggestions. The Fortigate costs a bit more money but I don't have a problem with that as long as it is money well spent. So what are your thoughts on which device that I should go with?