Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of cmatchett
cmatchettFlag for United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

asked on

Exchange 2013 Archiving

Hi,

We are trailing Exchange 2013 archiving and we have a requirement for users not to be able to delete anything from the archive.

How can this be achieved?
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Simon Butler (Sembee)
Simon Butler (Sembee)
Flag of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Simon is right. That database can get very large. And it sounds like you want to put a hold on every user mailbox.

As Mohammed mentioned, an external archiving appliance is probably the best route. My personal preference would be a Barracuda Mail Archive.
https://www.barracuda.com/products/messagearchiver

Or if you need something Cloud Based you could look at Mimecast.
http://www.mimecast.com/
Avatar of cmatchett

ASKER

Thanks for the advice.  My next query should maybe be a new question...
So the exchange 2013 PA

http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2014/04/21/the-preferred-architecture.aspx

Let’s work on the premise that we go with exchange archiving.

If you were to go with the minimum of 2 servers in each datacentre with 4 copies each, how would you deal with the databases that are used for archiving?

Would you add an additional server to each datacentre for the archive databases and make them highly available across these servers?

I suppose that would be 2 separate DAGs.
That would be two additional DAGs that is if you want redundancy.  In most cases, redundancy is for "hot email" (i.e. current which in most enterprises is 1 to 3 months) and not for "cold email" (i.e. archived).  Is this a requirement or nice to have.  Also note that users could have the archived items in their OST file and you could control how many months you want in OST or what size OST.
How many users?
4000 users
Have you run your design by the 2013 Sizing Calculator?
http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/Exchange-2013-Server-Role-f8a61780

It will tell you what you need for the entire environment, including the archive.

But yea, I would keep the archive in its own database on its own drives. Could be on its own low cost, low tier storage. You could include it in a DAG for high availability.
On the exchange calculator, you can only add in that the user is using a personal archive.

You cannot say that you are using a separate database and so on...