Solved

# subnetting

Posted on 2014-10-03
337 Views
I'm studying for the Network + test, and for subnetting, I don't have a problem subnetting class C networks, but I'm confused on class B.
the method the book I'm using is to ask 5 questions
how many subnets - the formula is 2 to the X power - x = number of masked bits - no problems there
how many hosts per subnet - formula is 2 to the Y power minus 2    y = number of host per subnet
what art the valid subnets formula is  265 - subnet mask = block size aka increment number   -  now this is what throws me,
so, for example, if i have a class B network and the mask is 255.255.240.0 (/20) i would use the formula
256-240 = 16 so the block size or increment number is 16. in the book, he makes a chart like this

subnet        0.0         16.0              32.0          48.0
first host     0.1         16.1              32.1          48.1
last host     15.254   31.254         47.254      63.254

so does this mean that in the first column for instance. if the address is 172.16.X.Y the first host address is 172.16.0.1 and the last address in subnet 0.0 is 172.16.15.254? which means there are LOTS of hosts?
0
Question by:JeffBeall
[X]
###### Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

• Help others & share knowledge
• Earn cash & points

LVL 25

Accepted Solution

Ken Boone earned 167 total points
ID: 40360147
Yes that is exactly what it means... It also measn that 172.16.1.0 and 172.16.2.0 and 3.0, etc.. are all host addresses inside that large block.

Now in the real world you would only carve a class B this large to hand out to sub-organizations where it will be chopped up further.  You would never want a flat network that large.

But you got it!
0

LVL 26

Assisted Solution

Fred Marshall earned 167 total points
ID: 40360153
Forget about "classes" for a moment at least.
I don't know why people continue to introduce this archaic term.  Lazy I guess.

But, to answer your question.  Yes.  That's it.  You have interpreted the table correctly.
0

LVL 22

Assisted Solution

Jody Lemoine earned 166 total points
ID: 40360154
You've got it exactly. The example you gave gives you 4094 hosts per subnet and 16 equally-sized subnets off of your /16.
0

LVL 1

Author Closing Comment

ID: 40360289
ok, thank you.
0

## Featured Post

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

### Suggested Solutions

RHEL6 + dockers - No route to host 7 97
site - site VPN 3 79
ASA NAT rule change 3 82
Samsung Tablet no Internet but does connect to WiFi 7 46
Even if you have implemented a Mobile Device Management solution company wide, it is a good idea to make sure you are taking into account all of the major risks to your electronic protected health information (ePHI).
Join Greg Farro and Ethan Banks from Packet Pushers (http://packetpushers.net/podcast/podcasts/pq-show-93-smart-network-monitoring-paessler-sponsored/) and Greg Ross from Paessler (https://www.paessler.com/prtg) for a discussion about smart network …
Viewers will learn how to properly install and use Secure Shell (SSH) to work on projects or homework remotely. Download Secure Shell: Follow basic installation instructions: Open Secure Shell and use "Quick Connect" to enter credentials includi…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
###### Suggested Courses
Course of the Month7 days, 23 hours left to enroll