Solved

subnetting

Posted on 2014-10-03
4
340 Views
Last Modified: 2014-10-03
I'm studying for the Network + test, and for subnetting, I don't have a problem subnetting class C networks, but I'm confused on class B.
the method the book I'm using is to ask 5 questions
how many subnets - the formula is 2 to the X power - x = number of masked bits - no problems there
how many hosts per subnet - formula is 2 to the Y power minus 2    y = number of host per subnet
what art the valid subnets formula is  265 - subnet mask = block size aka increment number   -  now this is what throws me,
so, for example, if i have a class B network and the mask is 255.255.240.0 (/20) i would use the formula
256-240 = 16 so the block size or increment number is 16. in the book, he makes a chart like this

subnet        0.0         16.0              32.0          48.0
first host     0.1         16.1              32.1          48.1
last host     15.254   31.254         47.254      63.254
broadcast   15.255   31.255        47.255       63.255

so does this mean that in the first column for instance. if the address is 172.16.X.Y the first host address is 172.16.0.1 and the last address in subnet 0.0 is 172.16.15.254? which means there are LOTS of hosts?
0
Comment
Question by:JeffBeall
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
4 Comments
 
LVL 25

Accepted Solution

by:
Ken Boone earned 167 total points
ID: 40360147
Yes that is exactly what it means... It also measn that 172.16.1.0 and 172.16.2.0 and 3.0, etc.. are all host addresses inside that large block.

Now in the real world you would only carve a class B this large to hand out to sub-organizations where it will be chopped up further.  You would never want a flat network that large.

But you got it!
0
 
LVL 26

Assisted Solution

by:Fred Marshall
Fred Marshall earned 167 total points
ID: 40360153
Forget about "classes" for a moment at least.
I don't know why people continue to introduce this archaic term.  Lazy I guess.

But, to answer your question.  Yes.  That's it.  You have interpreted the table correctly.
0
 
LVL 22

Assisted Solution

by:Jody Lemoine
Jody Lemoine earned 166 total points
ID: 40360154
You've got it exactly. The example you gave gives you 4094 hosts per subnet and 16 equally-sized subnets off of your /16.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Closing Comment

by:JeffBeall
ID: 40360289
ok, thank you.
0

Featured Post

Free NetCrunch network monitor licenses!

Only on Experts-Exchange: Sign-up for a free-trial and we'll send you your permanent license!

Here is what you get: 30 Nodes | Unlimited Sensors | No Time Restrictions | Absolutely FREE!

Act now. This offer ends July 14, 2017.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

#Citrix #Citrix Netscaler #HTTP Compression #Load Balance
During and after that shift to cloud, one area that still poses a struggle for many organizations is what to do with their department file shares.
Get a first impression of how PRTG looks and learn how it works.   This video is a short introduction to PRTG, as an initial overview or as a quick start for new PRTG users.
Monitoring a network: why having a policy is the best policy? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the enormous benefits of having a policy-based approach when monitoring medium and large networks. Software utilized in this v…

691 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question