• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 322
  • Last Modified:

Getting a COUNT of records in a result set without using a GROUP BY clause (SQL query help)

I have the following query:

SELECT DISTINCT s.SUPPLIER_CODE AS SupplierCode, l.SUPPLIER_NAME AS SupplierName from MEDMGR.CMTRS_TB_VALIDATED_SUPPLIERS s, MEDMGR.CMTRS_TO_BE_VALIDATED v, MEDMGR.CMTR_VALIDATION_SUPPLIER_LIST l where s.CMTR_ELID=v.CMTR_ELID and RECORD_DATE > 1412476555  and l.SUPPLIER_CODE= s.SUPPLIER_CODE and l.QUALITY_INDEX != -1

Open in new window


(The date above is just a UNIX timestamp from yesterday)
It appears that I will not be able to use a GROUP BY clause.
I need to add a COUNT of the distinct SUPPLIER_CODE and the number of times it appears in the result set without using a GROUP BY in the statement.



Results should look like this...
SUPPLIERCODE           SUPPLIER_NAME       SUPPLIERCODECN
SupplierA                       WidgetCo101                        2
SupplierB                       Mikes Toy Co.                       1
SupplierC                       Goober Enterprises             3
0
Mike Miller
Asked:
Mike Miller
2 Solutions
 
slightwv (䄆 Netminder) Commented:
Why can't you use a group by?

To get a count based on a value, group by is the standard.

You might be able to muck up perfectly good SQL and make the select a lot more expensive to run but why would you?
0
 
sdstuberCommented:
similar to your previous question, simply extend the group by to include the name


 
SELECT s.supplier_code AS suppliercode, l.supplier_name AS suppliername, COUNT(*) AS suppliercodecn
    FROM medmgr.cmtrs_tb_validated_suppliers s,
         medmgr.cmtrs_to_be_validated v,
         medmgr.cmtr_validation_supplier_list l
   WHERE s.cmtr_elid = v.cmtr_elid
     AND record_date > 1412476555
     AND l.supplier_code = s.supplier_code
     AND l.quality_index != -1
GROUP BY s.supplier_code, l.supplier_name

Open in new window


or, if the name might change for a given supplier code but you only want to show one, then you'll have to pick one.

Use could use an aggregate for that as well, for example MIN


 
 SELECT s.supplier_code AS suppliercode,
         MIN(l.supplier_name) AS suppliername,
         COUNT(*) AS suppliercodecn
    FROM medmgr.cmtrs_tb_validated_suppliers s,
         medmgr.cmtrs_to_be_validated v,
         medmgr.cmtr_validation_supplier_list l
   WHERE s.cmtr_elid = v.cmtr_elid
     AND record_date > 1412476555
     AND l.supplier_code = s.supplier_code
     AND l.quality_index != -1
GROUP BY s.supplier_code

Open in new window

0
 
Mike MillerSoftware EngineerAuthor Commented:
You're right. I was thinking I couldn't use that clause, but it turns out I can. Thanks for bearing with me.
0

Featured Post

The 14th Annual Expert Award Winners

The results are in! Meet the top members of our 2017 Expert Awards. Congratulations to all who qualified!

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now