Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of mbudman
mbudmanFlag for Canada

asked on

SAN versus Local storage

Hello,

I am currently provisioning equipment and resources for a client of mine and I could use some advice.

The environment:

Company: Software developers with 100 employees

Requirements: ESXi server(s), lots of RAM & Storage

Comments: Super fast disk access is not a requirement (i.e. 7200 RPM drives are sufficient).

Problem:

HA, sharing of data storage, load balancing are not necessary; most important requirements are ability to backup, and having necessary resources available

Since the main purpose of the servers is to do testing, no serious controls are required (except like I was saying backups and some level of redundancy with hard drives)

To meet the needs, I will be purchasing the appropriate  vmware licenses and server(s) as required.

Now the question is how to go about identifying the type of storage that would best serve the company

I have a reasonable understanding of the SAN, which basically leaves me with 2 options:

1. Purchase a SAN and communicate to SAN via ISCSi (fibre channel is too expensive for the size of the company); Due to the size of the company, I am looking at the HP P2000 SAN; Server(s) would be diskless

2.  Purchase servers with appropriate local storage;

I am not certain which way to go would be  best. I understand the benefits of both, but possibly, based on requirements local storage would be sufficient. I can definitely purchase enough local storage in each server to meet the requirements.

Does anyone have any suggestions / recommendations as how to proceed?

Thanks in advance.

Mark
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Wilder_Admin
Wilder_Admin
Flag of Germany image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert PRO / EE Fellow/British Beekeeper)
Have you considered the SAS attached version of the P2000 which is faster than the iSCSI version ?

You will only require a SAN, if you want to use VMware HA and vMotion.

What would you do if a Host Server failed, e.g. PSU, motherboard, RAM etc, what would you do with the VMs?

What downtime can you afford ?
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
So there would be 100 users and they would be doing only software development.

HA, sharing of data storage, load balancing are not necessary; most important requirements are ability to backup, and having necessary resources available.

My recommendations are as below and I am sure that others would point out their recommendations too.

Things you need to make sure with regard hard ware (storage & servers);

1. Make sure that the Vendors (HP, IBM etc..) have an authorized service center in your location.

2. The supplier of the hard ware has a good reputation in terms of price, delivery and after sale service. Moreover make sure that they do have handful of good technicians/engineers in their support department.

Storage Hard Disk:
Since you pointed out that you do not require much of RPM, you could make use of LFF HDDS (large form factor & size is 3.5) instead of SFF hard disk (small form factor 2.5"). But bear in mind that there is not much difference in price (this is only my point of view, as I am located in Middle East).

Enclosure for storage:
As per your comments, you do not require Fiber Channels. I am mostly using IBM due to 2 main reasons. 1st they do have a very reputed service center at my location. 2 They do replace parts in 24 hours (but in your case this would be different.)

IBM v3700 series will suit your needs with LFF HDDS (capacity of HDDS depends upon your clients requirement). It has built in ISCSi and an option for Fiber channels.

Servers:

I will be purchasing the appropriate vmware licenses and server(s) as required.

You do not need many servers, since your intention is to virtualize with VMware. My recommendation would be IBM servers (preferably M4. The number of CPUS/Cores/ RAM, depends upon the number of VMs your clients requires)

Do not forget to plan about UPS in their server room.

Wait for others to comment their recommendations (each one will have their experiences with each vendors like HP, IBM etc..)
Avatar of Member_2_231077
Member_2_231077

If you are buying HP servers the SFF disks could be migrated to a P2000 later should HA become a future requirement, the LFF disks are harder to re-use since the caddys are different. That may require you bought the more expensive SAS disks though since the ProLiant SFF SATA caddy doesn't have an interposer in it to make the SATA disks dual-ported.

You can always achieve HA using the internal disks anyway by using a virtual SAN appliance, that mirrors one machine's internal storage to that in another machine vis iSCSI.
Avatar of mbudman

ASKER

Thank you for your assistance.

Mark