Port-Channel Interface Bandwidth

I have configured a port channel interface that bundle 2 Ethernet interfaces (10000 Kbits each), I was expecting to see the Bandwidth of the port-channel to be 20000 Kbits, but it shows 100000Kbits.
I would like to know how it came up with this number.

Thanks
SW1#show etherchannel summary 
    Number of channel-groups in use: 2
Number of aggregators:           2

Group  Port-channel  Protocol    Ports
------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
1      Po1(SD)          -        Et0/0(D)    Et0/1(D)    

Open in new window





SW1#show interfaces e0/0 | include BW
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000 Kbit/sec, DLY 1000 usec, 
SW1#

Open in new window

SW1#show interfaces e0/1 | include BW
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000 Kbit/sec, DLY 1000 usec, 
SW1#

Open in new window

SW1#show interfaces port-channel 1 | include BW
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit/sec, DLY 100 usec, 
SW1#

Open in new window

jskfanAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

JustInCaseCommented:
Po1(SD)          -        Et0/0(D)    Et0/1(D)    

Your channel is down. When bundled in etherchannel should be something like

Po1(SU)         -      Et0/0(P)    Et0/1(P)

#sh etherchannel summary
Flags:  D - down        P - bundled in port-channel
        I - stand-alone s - suspended
        H - Hot-standby (LACP only)
        R - Layer3      S - Layer2
        U - in use      f - failed to allocate aggregator
        M - not in use, minimum links not met
        u - unsuitable for bundling
        w - waiting to be aggregated
        d - default port
0
jskfanAuthor Commented:
One port channel BW shows correct , but the other does not.


SW1#sh etherchannel summary 
    
Number of channel-groups in use: 2
Number of aggregators:           2

Group  Port-channel  Protocol    Ports
------+-------------+-----------+-----------------------------------------------
1      Po1(SU)          -        Et0/0(P)    Et0/1(P)    
2      Po2(SU)          -        Et0/2(P)    Et0/3(P)    

SW1#

Open in new window


SW1#sh interfaces port-channel 1 | include BW
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit/sec, DLY 100 usec, 
SW1#sh interfaces port-channel 2 | include BW
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 20000 Kbit/sec, DLY 1000 usec, 
SW1#

Open in new window

0
JustInCaseCommented:
Probably some misconfiguration on ports:
Delete port channel and set interfaces to default config, and try again.
Setting on interfaces (on both side) must be the same. (Po1 has DLY 100 usec, Po2 DLY 1000 usec - one of them is not at default value - and that's the probable reason for error - switch from other side probably have some different setting than SW1) :)

You cab restore interfaces to their defaults (under interface) with
Router(config-if)#default interface fa0/0
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Ultimate Tool Kit for Technology Solution Provider

Broken down into practical pointers and step-by-step instructions, the IT Service Excellence Tool Kit delivers expert advice for technology solution providers. Get your free copy now.

jskfanAuthor Commented:
Reload ...fixed it..Thanks
0
jskfanAuthor Commented:
Thanks
0
JustInCaseCommented:
Any time. :)
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Routers

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.