?
Solved

Recommended size of Subnet

Posted on 2014-10-25
7
Medium Priority
?
266 Views
Last Modified: 2014-10-26
I wonder what's the recommended size of each subnet. for instance how many hosts should be in each subnets, considering mapping Vlan to subnet.
Example:
let's say I have this network 172.16.0.0/16 that I will subnet and make it 172.16.0.0/24
This will give me 256 Subnets of 254 hosts each, and each Subnet will have it is own Broadcast address : example:
Network:   172.16.0.0/24          
Broadcast: 172.16.0.255          
HostMin:   172.16.0.1            
HostMax:   172.16.0.254          
Hosts/Net: 254                    


Network:   172.16.1.0/24          
Broadcast: 172.16.1.255          
HostMin:   172.16.1.1            
HostMax:   172.16.1.254          
Hosts/Net: 254

As know Best practice is to map each subnet to a specific Vlan. however I am not sure if 254 hosts in one  Vlan does not impact performance.

OR do I need to subnet it further:  to /25 or /26 in order to have smaller subnets ?

Thanks
0
Comment
Question by:jskfan
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • +1
7 Comments
 
LVL 50

Accepted Solution

by:
Don Johnston earned 860 total points
ID: 40404354
Unfortunately, there is no absolute answer.  It used to be the size of the network was limited by collisions. But now that we use switches, collisions are no longer a limiting factor.

Excessive broadcast can be a limiting factor (rule of thumb is more than 20% is excessive). But you have to have a lot of devices to hit that number.

So at the end of the day, the size of the subnet usually becomes a management/security issue.  Which means as large as a few thousand to as small as 2.
0
 
LVL 18

Assisted Solution

by:Akinsd
Akinsd earned 860 total points
ID: 40404372
Avoid subnets larger than 510 hosts (/23) as much as possible
Cisco still recommends a maximum of 500 which is 510
I also recommended also to have QoS in place, but a MUST for networks with more than 500 hosts (all subnets combined) to ensure that 1 host does not hog traffic unecessarily.

/25 (126 hosts) or /26 (62 hosts) are good as long as you have enough IPs for hosts in respective subnets.

Broadcast storms may cause congestion, collisions and eventual packet loss. Mac Address flooding can cause a switch to function as a hub and will pass traffic in all directions.
0
 
LVL 26

Expert Comment

by:Fred Marshall
ID: 40404384
I agree with Don Johnson.  One size does not fit all.  That answers your question pretty well.
It's important to first define what your problem is.
0
Connect further...control easier

With the ATEN CE624, you can now enjoy a high-quality visual experience powered by HDBaseT technology and the convenience of a single Cat6 cable to transmit uncompressed video with zero latency and multi-streaming for dual-view applications where remote access is required.

 

Author Comment

by:jskfan
ID: 40404429
172.16.0.0/25 will give 512 Subnets with 126 Hosts each.

So if a VLAN has 126 hosts , will that be too much with regards to performance ?
0
 
LVL 26

Assisted Solution

by:Fred Marshall
Fred Marshall earned 280 total points
ID: 40404463
As I said in other words: "it depends".

With 126 hosts AND smart switches AND typical office traffic then most certainly.
Without the smart switches - very likely yes.
But, if the traffic is unusual then ... how unusual is it?
0
 
LVL 18

Expert Comment

by:Akinsd
ID: 40404479
You should be fine with /25.
2 subnets with 126 hosts each constitute 2 separate broadcast domains as they have a routed interface separating them. That's one of the main purpose of subnetting, to contain broadcast domains in small chunks.
It's like dividing a class of 510 grade 2 students into 2 classes. Imagine 126 students shouting (broadcasting) messages to everyone compared to 510 students shouting messages. There is more discombobulation in the class of 510 than 126.
You should however implement QoS on your core switch. Auto QoS should suffice
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:jskfan
ID: 40404976
Thank you
0

Featured Post

What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Problem Description:   Couple of months ago we upgraded the ADSL line at our branch office from Home to Business line. The purpose of transforming the service to have static public IP’s. We were in need for public IP’s to publish our web resour…
This article will show how Aten was able to supply easy management and control for Artear's video walls and wide range display configurations of their newsroom.
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
Suggested Courses

762 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question