Solved

VM replication and corruption

Posted on 2014-10-28
4
208 Views
Last Modified: 2014-10-31
If a VM is replicated over 2 sites (2 unique SAN's), if the VMDK hosting the OS, apps, databases and DB backups in the primary site corrupts for whatever reason - will the corruption also be replicated to the copy on the other site? Our admin is writing backups to a local drive on a VM, he claims if the hardware (i.e. SAN) failed then he wouldn't lose both the online DB and the backup as the copy on the other SAN would stay in tact. Yet I wasn't sure if the same rules apply for corruption as opposed infrastructure failure?
0
Comment
Question by:pma111
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 2

Accepted Solution

by:
MadHatterAdmin earned 250 total points
ID: 40408624
Depends totally on your SAN replication schedule and OR if you're utilizing something like snap shots of your SAN LUNs.

If you're replication schedule is every 15 mins (hypothetically) by the time i type this reply there's a good chance that data is gone.

On the other hand, if you're using a SAN vendor and are utilizing LUN snapshots along with replication you should be able to mount and recover that server before corruption at a certain point in time. The solution to your issue replies solely on the implementation of your storage infrastructure.
0
 
LVL 120

Assisted Solution

by:Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2) earned 250 total points
ID: 40408668
That would depend on when the corruption occurred, and if the replication was before of after the event.

Our admin is writing backups to a local drive on a VM, he claims if the hardware (i.e. SAN) failed then he wouldn't lose both the online DB and the backup as the copy on the other SAN would stay in tact.

That's possibly true, if you are copying data to SAN A, and SAN A copies to SAN B, if SAN A, should fail and not be available, the data will still be on SAN B.
0
 
LVL 3

Author Comment

by:pma111
ID: 40410147
I was classing corruption and failure as 2 different things in this instance. So their view on failure would stand true, but possibly not for corruption.
0
 
LVL 120
ID: 40410189
If's corrupt the replicated data would also be corrupt.
0

Featured Post

Three Reasons Why Backup is Strategic

Backup is strategic to your business because your data is strategic to your business. Without backup, your business will fail. This white paper explains why it is vital for you to design and immediately execute a backup strategy to protect 100 percent of your data.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

HOW TO: Connect to the VMware vSphere Hypervisor 6.5 (ESXi 6.5) using the vSphere (HTML5 Web) Host Client 6.5, and perform a simple configuration task of adding a new VMFS 6 datastore.
Teach the user how to rename, unmount, delete and upgrade VMFS datastores. Open vSphere Web Client: Rename VMFS and NFS datastores: Upgrade VMFS-3 volume to VMFS-5: Unmount VMFS datastore: Delete a VMFS datastore:
How to install and configure Citrix XenApp 6.5 - Part 1. In this video tutorial we have explained step by step installation of Citrix XenApp 6.5 Server on Windows Server 2008 R2 is explained in this video. We have explained the difference between…

733 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question