How to retrieve employee id of managers

Hello,
I'm working on an application that I inherited.  There is an employee table that lists all the employees as well as the managers.  The problem is that the table uses a the last name of the manager as a key field rather than a manager id field.  I'm added a mgr_id field.  I am now trying to populate the mgr_id field by executing a query that returns the employee id of each manager and using that employee id field named CUID to populate the mgr_id field that I added.  I started off by writing a sql query that returns that information to verify that I was selecting the correct value.  However, it is still retreiving only the cuid of the employee and not of the manager.

SELECT Employee.CUID, Employee.Mgr_LName
FROM Employee
WHERE Employee.[Mgr_LName] In (SELECT LName FROM Employee);
Juan VelasquezAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

ReneD100Commented:
SELECT E.CUID, E.Mgr_LName, M.CUID
FROM Employee E, Employee M
WHERE E.Mgr_LName=M.LName

Open in new window

The E.CUID is the Employee ID, the M.CUID is the Managers' CUID
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Juan VelasquezAuthor Commented:
Thanks Rene.  I was starting to write a recursive query and you saved me quite a bit of time.
0
PatHartmanCommented:
You need to specify a join type or you will end up with a non-updatable query.

SELECT E.CUID, E.Mgr_LName, M.CUID
FROM Employee E Inner Join Employee M On E.Mgr_LName=M.LName

Of course, this update will be problematic if you have multiple employees/managers with the same last name so I would check that first by creating a duplicates query to look for employee records that duplicate last names.

Select LName, Count(*) As RecCount
From Employee
Group By LName
Having Count(*) > 1;
0
The Ultimate Tool Kit for Technolgy Solution Provi

Broken down into practical pointers and step-by-step instructions, the IT Service Excellence Tool Kit delivers expert advice for technology solution providers. Get your free copy for valuable how-to assets including sample agreements, checklists, flowcharts, and more!

Juan VelasquezAuthor Commented:
Thanks Pat
0
PatHartmanCommented:
I guess you didn't need an updateable query.
0
Juan VelasquezAuthor Commented:
Hello Pat,

In this case, the solution posted by Rene works.  However, I'm using your solution for another problem.  To be honest, I much prefer the join syntax as it more clearly delineates the where condition.
0
PatHartmanCommented:
Access treats the two queries very differently.  Rene's query produces a Cartesian Product where every row from table 1 is matched against every row from table 2 and the recordset is then whittled down by the criteria.  That is why the query is not updateable.  you can also run into memory issues if the two tables have more than a small number of rows.  1,000 rows x 10,000 rows = 10 million rows!!! before the criteria is applied.  So, unless you really want a Cartesian Product, I would never use Rene's query.  Since every row is joined to every other row, no indexes or other shortcuts can be employed by the query engine.
0
Juan VelasquezAuthor Commented:
In my case, the solution posted by renee works since I didn't need an updatable query.  But I do see your point and will use that approach.  However since Renee first, provided me with the solution that worked for the problem I was working I gave Renee the points, before I saw your answer.  I'm not sure if I can reasign points at this stage.
0
PatHartmanCommented:
You could but there is no need to do so.  I just wanted you to understand why you shouldn't use Cartesian Products lightly.
0
Juan VelasquezAuthor Commented:
Thanks Pat.  I appreciate your clarification.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Microsoft Access

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.