I understand that the method of using a "windows NLB" provide load balancing and not FT for connected mapi sessions. - ie the client would need to close outlook and reconnect.
argument/discussion at work from colleague is that Exchange 2010 has its own "native" CAS array tool to provide true FT.
and that I should have used it and this would have "automatically" failed over the mapi sessions without them closing and reopening outlook. (NOT a hardware load balancer) - I know of no such tool inside Exchange for CAS array. DAG for Database - yes. Were talking about CAS array not DAG
Am I wrong? I'm aware that MS don't recommend the windows NLB now - however at time of build they did. (so we went with it)
Is there a native Exchange method of providing Fault tolerance for 2 x CAS servers?
Unable to change the program that handles the scan event from a network attached Canon/Brother printer/scanner. This means you'll always have to choose which program handles this action, e.g. ControlCenter4 (in the case of a Brother).
This video shows how to quickly and easily deploy an email signature for all users in Office 365 and prevent it from being added to replies and forwards. (the resulting signature is applied on the server level in Exchange Online)
The email signat…
Exchange organizations may use the Journaling Agent of the Transport Service to archive messages going through Exchange. However, if the Transport Service is integrated with some email content management application (such as an antispam), the admini…