?
Solved

OSPF Creates routing loop between sites

Posted on 2014-11-07
2
Medium Priority
?
229 Views
Last Modified: 2014-11-10
We have just upgraded our core network with some nice new Cisco hardware. The configs from the old have been moved across successfully and have caused no problems thus far.

Our issue appears when we create a static route on Core 1 which points towards Core 2's internet gateway.
Example of static route:

ip route 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0 172.16.0.254

Instead of Core 2 learning that route it picks up a route pointing back to Core 1 creating a nice routing loop. I was aiming for Core 2 to fire that IP out of its default route (which is 172.16.0.254) where 192.168.100.X resides.

This is the output from sh ip route 192.168.100.1 on Core 2:

Routing entry for 192.168.100.0/24
  Known via "ospf 1", distance 110, metric 20, type extern 2, forward metric 1
  Last update from 192.168.255.253 on Vlan18, 00:00:11 ago
  Routing Descriptor Blocks:
  * 192.168.255.253, from 192.168.255.253, 00:00:11 ago, via Vlan18
      Route metric is 20, traffic share count is 1


The following is the OSPF config of both Core 2, Core 1 had a router-id of 192.168.255.253:

router ospf 1
 router-id 192.168.255.254
 log-adjacency-changes
 redistribute static subnets
 network 10.30.0.0 0.0.1.255 area 0
 network 10.30.30.0 0.0.1.255 area 0
 network 10.32.0.0 0.0.1.255 area 0
 network 10.32.30.0 0.0.1.255 area 0
 network 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 area 0
 network 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
 network 192.168.30.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
 network 192.168.31.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
 network 192.168.32.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
 network 192.168.34.0 0.0.1.255 area 0
 network 192.168.36.0 0.0.1.255 area 0
 network 192.168.201.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
 network 192.168.255.0 0.0.0.3 area 0
 network 192.168.255.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
 default-information originate


Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
0
Comment
Question by:jrb139
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
2 Comments
 
LVL 46

Accepted Solution

by:
Craig Beck earned 2000 total points
ID: 40429070
You'll need to add a static to Core2 also.

Core2 has learned that route via Core1 and it doesn't have a more specific route in its own routing table to that subnet, so it will send traffic back to Core1 as that's where it thinks it needs to go to.  The problem is that routing updates don't include the actual gateway address - they include the subnet only and the sending router's interface IP is used as the gateway, so you redistributing static routes isn't doing what you think it's doing.

When a route is received it is basically an announcement from the sending router that it can reach the specified destination.  The interface IP of the sending router is therefore the gateway address for that route.  If a similar route is received from a different router its IP address is also a candidate to route traffic for that subnet and that's how we end up with more than one route sometimes.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:jrb139
ID: 40432170
Thanks, that explains it then! A really well explained and easy to understand answer.
Cheers!
0

Featured Post

Ransomware Attacks Keeping You Up at Night?

Will your organization be ransomware's next victim?  The good news is that these attacks are predicable and therefore preventable. Learn more about how you can  stop a ransomware attacks before encryption takes place with our Ransomware Prevention Kit!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

As companies replace their old PBX phone systems with Unified IP Communications, many are finding out that legacy applications such as fax do not work well with VoIP. Fortunately, Cloud Faxing provides a cost-effective alternative that works over an…
Join Greg Farro and Ethan Banks from Packet Pushers (http://packetpushers.net/podcast/podcasts/pq-show-93-smart-network-monitoring-paessler-sponsored/) and Greg Ross from Paessler (https://www.paessler.com/prtg) for a discussion about smart network …
If you're a developer or IT admin, you’re probably tasked with managing multiple websites, servers, applications, and levels of security on a daily basis. While this can be extremely time consuming, it can also be frustrating when systems aren't wor…
Monitoring a network: how to monitor network services and why? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the philosophy behind service monitoring and why a handshake validation is critical in network monitoring. Software utilized …

777 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question