Solved

Windows 2008 with multiple IP's assigned to different source NATs

Posted on 2014-11-13
9
131 Views
Last Modified: 2014-12-09
My firewall has two different subnets assigned to it's outside interface.  The first subnet has a series of NATs to the IP address 192.168.160.13.  I have a series of NATs on the other subnet to 192.168.160.41.  Both the .13 and .41 IP's are assigned to a single NIC.  The first series of NATs work just, however the second series does not.  The reason being is that they are replying on the wrong IP address on the outside interface.  My firewall has a source NAT rule that states all requests from 192.168.160.41 are you go out on the specified IP address.  This being in the second subnet, however, Windows is overriding this and sending it out on the first subnet.  I know my firewall rules work for I've used them on other hosts, however, those hosts didn't have multiple IP's on a single NIC.  Any ideas on how to make this work?
0
Comment
Question by:gopher_49
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 5
  • 4
9 Comments
 
LVL 58

Expert Comment

by:Cliff Galiher
ID: 40441801
Windows *can't* override your firewall NAT rules.   That just isn't how it works.

BUT.  Windows can send traffic out of the first IP address bound to a NIC. It is up to the application to specify which adapter(s) and which IP(s) to use. The application binds to these assets via Winsock. Many applications just grab *everything* and windows can't be psychic, so it has a simple logic. Highest bound IP wins unless the application specifies otherwise. So this is purely application-specific. You have to configure your application to send traffic out .41 or to reply on the same IP it received traffic on. And if the app doesn't support this...well....nothing you can do. You can even have this problem with multiple adapters if the application is not coded to bind only to specific adapters. Same simple logic. Highest bound IP on the highest bound adapter with the shortest routing metric (which, with two IP's on the same private subnet, means routing metrics don't apply unless you declare static routes.)
0
 

Author Comment

by:gopher_49
ID: 40441838
I'm using IIS..  So..  The NAT sends the traffic to 192.168.160.41, however, the reply is not coming from 192.168.160.41.  Due to this the source NAT on my firewall doesn't send the traffic out the correct IP.  I have this particular website bound to 192.168.160.41.. But.. It still doesn't reply back on 192.168.160.41
0
 
LVL 58

Expert Comment

by:Cliff Galiher
ID: 40441845
You can do this with IIS, but it isn't trivial, and certainly isn't default behavior. Keep in mind that IIS can act as a proxy and a reverse proxy, so it has a lot of sophistication under the hood. And it is used in so many different ways that assuming a "default" is never a good idea. Hence it falls back to Windows behavior unless you dig in and configure it.

Note that this is further complicated if you stuck with tradition and used 255.255.255.0 (/24) as the subnet mask for your two IPs. Then you have two addresses on the same subnet and that can definitely wonkify Windows.  If you can isolate those, you'll have better luck right out of the gate.
0
Connect further...control easier

With the ATEN CE624, you can now enjoy a high-quality visual experience powered by HDBaseT technology and the convenience of a single Cat6 cable to transmit uncompressed video with zero latency and multi-streaming for dual-view applications where remote access is required.

 

Author Comment

by:gopher_49
ID: 40441855
Can I assign a useable/public IP directly to a NIC and enable Windows firewall on that NIC?  I have a virtual NIC I can mount to it that is bound to my WAN network...  This will result in two different gateways,  however, they are different subnets.  If this won't work what exactly do I need to do?
0
 
LVL 58

Expert Comment

by:Cliff Galiher
ID: 40441860
That depends on your firewall. And having two gateways can also be a routing nightmare.  I don't have any good advice due to the complexity of the potential environment.
0
 

Author Comment

by:gopher_49
ID: 40441891
I thought by binding 192.168.160.41 to my website within IIS would result in the source IP being 192.168.160.41 which would honor my source NAT.  I wondering if introducing the remote access and routing service might work..  Maybe set a source NAT via it..
0
 
LVL 58

Expert Comment

by:Cliff Galiher
ID: 40441942
Won't matter. RRAS is still after IIS in the pipeline. You have to fix it in IIS.
0
 

Accepted Solution

by:
gopher_49 earned 0 total points
ID: 40441983
It works just fine with a public / useable IP on the second NIC.  But I have a feeling eventually I'll have some routing issues.  I'm going to perform a wireshark on it..  I'm 99% sure the PAT/NAT from my public / useable IP is translating to 192.168.160.41 but a different source IP is replying and then ignoring the SNAT and going through the other outside interface...
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:gopher_49
ID: 40488430
Fixed it myself for all other options did not work.
0

Featured Post

Enterprise Mobility and BYOD For Dummies

Like “For Dummies” books, you can read this in whatever order you choose and learn about mobility and BYOD; and how to put a competitive mobile infrastructure in place. Developed for SMBs and large enterprises alike, you will find helpful use cases, planning, and implementation.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

The recent Microsoft changes on update philosophy for Windows pre-10 and their impact on existing WSUS implementations.
Possible fixes for Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 updating problem. Solutions mentioned are from Microsoft themselves. I started a case with them from our Microsoft Silver Partner option to open a case and get direct support from Microsoft. If s…
This tutorial will walk an individual through the steps necessary to configure their installation of BackupExec 2012 to use network shared disk space. Verify that the path to the shared storage is valid and that data can be written to that location:…
This tutorial will show how to configure a new Backup Exec 2012 server and move an existing database to that server with the use of the BEUtility. Install Backup Exec 2012 on the new server and apply all of the latest hotfixes and service packs. The…

627 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question