Differing sender adress , reply-to and sender name in E-Mail

Hi experts,

a short question regarding emails.

We are planning an email newsletter using a software called "superwebmailer".
There we have the possibility to use an SMTP-Account for sending via our hosting-provider.
Let`s say we use the following account for sending:

test@internal.de (only an example)

In the newsletter as the sender-address and bounce-address we  would like to use the following, because we want automatic answers and bounces to be managed by us:

test@internal.de (only an example)

As  Display Name and reply-to address we would use following, because that`s the address where the "real" answers and mails should go to.

test@external.de (only an example)

Do you see any problems if we do it like this?

The Task is to send a newsletter for somebody else and real aswers should go to somebody else`s mail adrress, while bounces and auto-answers should go to an address that we manage.

How do you handle that?

Thanks in advance!
SystemadministrationAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

frankhelkCommented:
Hmmm - as far as I remember the spec (RFC 5322), there are only the following originator fields for the header:

"From:"
"Sender:"
"Reply-To:"

You might add other fields, but it's almost sure that no software will acknowledge them. With respect to the explanations in section "3.6.2. Originator Fields" of RFC 5322 I would place the client's email address into "From:", your address into "Sender:". Since replies should go to the client, a line for "Reply-To:" is obsolete.

To receive the error notifications, you should specify your address in the "Return-Path:" field.

BTW: If you send your newsletter to a large group of recipients with a single message, you should ensure to send it to yourself (or some special address) and include the recipients in the "Bcc:" (Blind Carbon Copy) field. That would prevent the disclosure of the recipient list to each and every recipient.
0
SystemadministrationAuthor Commented:
Superwebmailer is especially for newsletters, so there is no need for a Bcc solution.

I`d do it as follows:

"From:" test@internal.de
 "Sender:" test@external.de
 "Reply-To:" test@external.de

Return-Path: test@internal.de
0
frankhelkCommented:
I would suggest

"From:" test@external.de
 "Sender:" test@internal.de
                  (or field omitted if you want to be more hidden)
 "Reply-To:" test@external.de
                     (maybe omitted, too, to be standard compliant)

Return-Path: test@internal.de
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Email Protocols

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.