Solved

hosts per vlan with juniper switches

Posted on 2014-11-14
1
263 Views
Last Modified: 2014-12-01
I inherited a network will all Juniper switches EX series. I notice that there are about 40 vlans and the subnets are /16. Isn't it too many hosts per vlan? What could go wrong in this case? From my understanding rstp is the default spanning tree on the Juniper. Now if there is convergence with rstp, it will affect the whole network and not just the vlan in per vlan stp. Correct? If yes, should I redesigned my rstp to per vlan rstp? Thanks in advance for your inputs.
0
Comment
Question by:leblanc
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
1 Comment
 
LVL 50

Accepted Solution

by:
Don Johnston earned 500 total points
ID: 40444319
I inherited a network will all Juniper switches EX series. I notice that there are about 40 vlans and the subnets are /16. Isn't it too many hosts per vlan? What could go wrong in this case?
The mask size only defines how many hosts could exist on a network. There could only be 50 hosts of the network. But with that mask, you could have 64,000.  The primary issue these days with large broadcast domains is excessive broadcast traffic.  In that case, you would see reduced bandwidth available and all hosts processing large volumes of broadcast traffic.

From my understanding rstp is the default spanning tree on the Juniper. Now if there is convergence with rstp, it will affect the whole network and not just the vlan in per vlan stp. Correct?
Yes. In a Common (or mono) Spanning Tree environment, there is only one instance of STP.  So if the network re-converges, it will affect traffic in all VLANs.

If yes, should I redesigned my rstp to per vlan rstp? Thanks in advance for your inputs.
I wouldn't say "should".  A Per-VLAN STP  (VSTP in Juniper parlance) environment is typically used to allow you to define different root bridges and path costs on a per-VLAN basis. That way you can control which ports are forwarding/blocking to provide better paths for the hosts.  Since in most multi-VLAN environments the VLANs cross common trunks, a failure causing re-convergence will most likely affect all VLANs.
0

Featured Post

Building an interactive eFuture classroom

Watch and learn how ATEN provided a total control system solution including seamless switching matrix switch, HDBaseT extenders, PDU, lighting control to build an interactive eFuture classroom.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Hello to you all, I hear of many people congratulate AWS (Amazon Web Services) on how easy it is to spin up and create new EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) instances, but then fail and struggle to connect to them using simple tools such as SSH (Secure…
Load balancing is the method of dividing the total amount of work performed by one computer between two or more computers. Its aim is to get more work done in the same amount of time, ensuring that all the users get served faster.
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
Here's a very brief overview of the methods PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg) offers for monitoring bandwidth, to help you decide which methods you´d like to investigate in more detail.  The methods are covered in more detail in o…

733 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question