Solved

hosts per vlan with juniper switches

Posted on 2014-11-14
1
266 Views
Last Modified: 2014-12-01
I inherited a network will all Juniper switches EX series. I notice that there are about 40 vlans and the subnets are /16. Isn't it too many hosts per vlan? What could go wrong in this case? From my understanding rstp is the default spanning tree on the Juniper. Now if there is convergence with rstp, it will affect the whole network and not just the vlan in per vlan stp. Correct? If yes, should I redesigned my rstp to per vlan rstp? Thanks in advance for your inputs.
0
Comment
Question by:leblanc
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
1 Comment
 
LVL 50

Accepted Solution

by:
Don Johnston earned 500 total points
ID: 40444319
I inherited a network will all Juniper switches EX series. I notice that there are about 40 vlans and the subnets are /16. Isn't it too many hosts per vlan? What could go wrong in this case?
The mask size only defines how many hosts could exist on a network. There could only be 50 hosts of the network. But with that mask, you could have 64,000.  The primary issue these days with large broadcast domains is excessive broadcast traffic.  In that case, you would see reduced bandwidth available and all hosts processing large volumes of broadcast traffic.

From my understanding rstp is the default spanning tree on the Juniper. Now if there is convergence with rstp, it will affect the whole network and not just the vlan in per vlan stp. Correct?
Yes. In a Common (or mono) Spanning Tree environment, there is only one instance of STP.  So if the network re-converges, it will affect traffic in all VLANs.

If yes, should I redesigned my rstp to per vlan rstp? Thanks in advance for your inputs.
I wouldn't say "should".  A Per-VLAN STP  (VSTP in Juniper parlance) environment is typically used to allow you to define different root bridges and path costs on a per-VLAN basis. That way you can control which ports are forwarding/blocking to provide better paths for the hosts.  Since in most multi-VLAN environments the VLANs cross common trunks, a failure causing re-convergence will most likely affect all VLANs.
0

Featured Post

Transaction Monitoring Vs. Real User Monitoring

Synthetic Transaction Monitoring Vs. Real User Monitoring: When To Use Each Approach? In this article, we will discuss two major monitoring approaches: Synthetic Transaction and Real User Monitoring.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Hello to you all, I hear of many people congratulate AWS (Amazon Web Services) on how easy it is to spin up and create new EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) instances, but then fail and struggle to connect to them using simple tools such as SSH (Secure…
WARNING:   If you follow the instructions here, you will wipe out your VTP and VLAN configurations.  Make sure you have backed up your switch!!! I recently had some issues with a few low-end Cisco routers (RV325) and I opened a case with Cisco TA…
There's a multitude of different network monitoring solutions out there, and you're probably wondering what makes NetCrunch so special. It's completely agentless, but does let you create an agent, if you desire. It offers powerful scalability …
In this video we outline the Physical Segments view of NetCrunch network monitor. By following this brief how-to video, you will be able to learn how NetCrunch visualizes your network, how granular is the information collected, as well as where to f…

707 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question