Solved

Declare a method with default arguments in C++ ( array of string)

Posted on 2014-11-22
9
152 Views
Last Modified: 2014-11-24
Hi Experts,

I have the following method :

void  setState (std::string reason, bool bAfter, std::list<std::string>& allStates);

Is there a way to declare it with default arguments for bool and std::list<std::string> ?

so that I can call it in some places of my code

setState("shutdown");


Thanks,
0
Comment
Question by:bachra04
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
9 Comments
 
LVL 86

Expert Comment

by:jkr
ID: 40459561
You can't provide a default argument for a 'std::list<std::string>&', since there is no NULL value for references. But why not just providing a 2nd overload for 'setState()' that only takes one argument, e.g.

void  setState (std::string reason, bool bAfter, std::list<std::string>& allStates);

// ...

void  setState (std::string reason) {

  std::list<std::string> empty_list;

  setState(reasob, true, empty_list); // call original 'setState()' with an empty list
}

Open in new window

0
 
LVL 32

Accepted Solution

by:
phoffric earned 500 total points
ID: 40459652
Maybe you can handle a "null" list by checking for an empty list:
std::list<std::string> defaultStates;

void  setState (std::string reason, bool bAfter = false, std::list<std::string>& allStates = defaultStates) {
   std::cout << reason << " bAfter = " << bAfter;
   if( !allStates.empty() )
   {
      std::cout << "  " << allStates.back();
      std::cout << "  " << allStates.front();
   }
   std::cout << std::endl;
}

int main() {
   defaultStates.push_back ("ON");
   defaultStates.push_back ("OFF");
   setState("default");
   defaultStates.push_front("the end");
   setState("actual ", true, defaultStates);
}

Open in new window

0
 
LVL 86

Expert Comment

by:jkr
ID: 40459710
BTW, as a side note - you might want to consider passing the 'reason' parameter as a 'string&', too. That will avoid copying the string at each call. And also consider making it 'const'. E.g.

void  setState (const std::string reason, bool bAfter, std::list<std::string>& allStates);

// ...

void  setState (const std::string& reason) {

  std::list<std::string> empty_list;

  setState(reasob, true, empty_list); // call original 'setState()' with an empty list
}
                                          

Open in new window

0
Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
LVL 86

Expert Comment

by:jkr
ID: 40459757
>>Maybe you can handle a "null" list by checking for an empty list:

Which means that you still have t pass an empty list that has to be declared and instantiated. Does not make that very elegant to handle...
0
 
LVL 32

Expert Comment

by:phoffric
ID: 40459801
I expect that the author has a reason for wanting to pass in a default list. Personally, I rarely use defaults because once you start, it never ends, and then I think, for others, reading the code becomes a little harder in tracking down whether an overload was called or whether a function with default values was called.
0
 
LVL 9

Expert Comment

by:Subrat (C++ windows/Linux)
ID: 40460334
In my opinion, just to achieve the default argument feature, we are creating a global list object or might be a data member. Which is totally unnecessary.
Better approach would be the calling 3-arg version from overloaded 1-arg version as told by JKR-(ID: 40459561).
0
 
LVL 32

Expert Comment

by:phoffric
ID: 40460337
I would expect that the author already has some object that represents what is desired to be the default value for the preponderance of cases. We are creating a global list object just to show how to address the author's question.
0
 
LVL 34

Expert Comment

by:sarabande
ID: 40461880
the following compiles without problems:

void  setState (std::string reason, bool bAfter = false, std::list<std::string>& allStates = std::list<std::string>())
{
    if (std::find(allStates.begin(), allStates.end(), reason) != allStates.end())
    {
        allStates.push_back(reason);
    }
}

Open in new window

so if you want a "default" which does nothing you can do it without defining a global list.

of course a "global" states list as suggested by phoffric makes more sense. you probably would provide the list by using a static get function like that:

class Global  // or use any other class ...
{
     static std::list<std::string> & getAllStates()
     {
           static std::list<std::string> allStates;
           return allStates;
     }
     ...
};

Open in new window

you could use it like:

void setState (std::string reason, bool bAfter = false, std::list<std::string>& allStates = std::list<std::string>())
{
    if (allStates.empty() == true)
    {
          allStates = Global::getAllStates();
    }
    if (std::find(allStates.begin(), allStates.end(), reason) != allStates.end())
    {
        allStates.push_back(reason);
    }
}

Open in new window


Sara
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:bachra04
ID: 40462306
Thanks Sara;

It is also a nice suggestion.
0

Featured Post

Enroll in June's Course of the Month

June's Course of the Month is now available! Every 10 seconds, a consumer gets hit with ransomware. Refresh your knowledge of ransomware best practices by enrolling in this month's complimentary course for Premium Members, Team Accounts, and Qualified Experts.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Often, when implementing a feature, you won't know how certain events should be handled at the point where they occur and you'd rather defer to the user of your function or class. For example, a XML parser will extract a tag from the source code, wh…
Container Orchestration platforms empower organizations to scale their apps at an exceptional rate. This is the reason numerous innovation-driven companies are moving apps to an appropriated datacenter wide platform that empowers them to scale at a …
The viewer will learn how to user default arguments when defining functions. This method of defining functions will be contrasted with the non-default-argument of defining functions.
The viewer will be introduced to the member functions push_back and pop_back of the vector class. The video will teach the difference between the two as well as how to use each one along with its functionality.

728 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question