• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 246
  • Last Modified:

Should I use Microsoft ATL or WTL for client Com support?

Hi:

It's been a while since I've worked in the world of COM.
I've got a basic Microsoft unmanaged C++ class with some methods I'd like to expose
through COM. There are no activex/ui associated with it; it's a straightforward simple class.

On the client side, I'm a little confused on to use to manage interfacing with the COM object.
Which template library to use: ATL or WTL?

I assume that they both have their own flavor of smart pointers.

Given a brief description of my needs, what is the correct way to go?
ATL or WTL?


Thanks,
JohnB
0
jxbma
Asked:
jxbma
1 Solution
 
jkrCommented:
Well, WTL is built on ATL (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Template_Library, yet the latter was more focused on ActiveX  - so the question basically boils down to "how fancy will your client GUI be?". If you e.g. need MDI support, go for WTL.
0
 
jxbmaSoftware ConsultantAuthor Commented:
So I guess ATL is probably the answer since there's no GUI component to the COM objects
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Free Tool: ZipGrep

ZipGrep is a utility that can list and search zip (.war, .ear, .jar, etc) archives for text patterns, without the need to extract the archive's contents.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way to say thank you for being a part of the community.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now