"Backwards" NAT Rules on a Cisco ASA 5505

Take a look at the 2 NAT rules on my Cisco ASA 5505. They exist to allow port 4430 and port 8001 traffic to travel from the the outside interface on the firewall to the server (10.20.2.3). They both work perfectly, and yet they both look completely backwards.

Note the inside"interface specified in the top left. It's the outside interface on the firewall that traffic is hitting and these NAT rules exist to handle.
Similarly, the Original/Source values and the Translated/Interface values seem ass-backwards, yet they work.

NAT Rules
jdanaAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Jan SpringerCommented:
It looks backwards because you are mapping the inside to the outside.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
jdanaAuthor Commented:
Jan Springer, please elaborate.
0
Jan SpringerCommented:
using cli where outside subnet is 172.16.34.0/24 without port forwarding):

static (outside,inside) 192.168.10.1 172.16.34.72 netmask 255.255.255.255

means maps the outside interface to the inside IP using the outside IP to the inside interface.

it would make more sense to have the inside to inside and outside to outside.
0
Big Business Goals? Which KPIs Will Help You

The most successful MSPs rely on metrics – known as key performance indicators (KPIs) – for making informed decisions that help their businesses thrive, rather than just survive. This eBook provides an overview of the most important KPIs used by top MSPs.

jdanaAuthor Commented:
Jan, Forgive my ignorance, I'm not a network guy. Is it reasonable to simplify this construct with the following "laymanish" statement, "The NAT Rule creates a "pathway" between the firewall's outside interface and the network interface of my server. As long as matching firewall rules exist allowing traffic, the NAT Rule is bi-directional. That is, it facilitates traffic both ways." A NAT rule based on the outside firewall interface would work as well.
0
Jan SpringerCommented:
The NAT rule takes a packet destined to an IP address, translates it and forwards the packet to the translated address.

And yes, a rule needs to exist both ways for consistent traffic flow.
0
jdanaAuthor Commented:
THANKS
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Cisco

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.