Solved

"Backwards" NAT Rules on a Cisco ASA 5505

Posted on 2014-12-12
6
362 Views
Last Modified: 2014-12-22
Take a look at the 2 NAT rules on my Cisco ASA 5505. They exist to allow port 4430 and port 8001 traffic to travel from the the outside interface on the firewall to the server (10.20.2.3). They both work perfectly, and yet they both look completely backwards.

Note the inside"interface specified in the top left. It's the outside interface on the firewall that traffic is hitting and these NAT rules exist to handle.
Similarly, the Original/Source values and the Translated/Interface values seem ass-backwards, yet they work.

NAT Rules
0
Comment
Question by:jdana
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 3
6 Comments
 
LVL 29

Accepted Solution

by:
Jan Springer earned 500 total points
ID: 40496395
It looks backwards because you are mapping the inside to the outside.
0
 

Author Comment

by:jdana
ID: 40496398
Jan Springer, please elaborate.
0
 
LVL 29

Expert Comment

by:Jan Springer
ID: 40496410
using cli where outside subnet is 172.16.34.0/24 without port forwarding):

static (outside,inside) 192.168.10.1 172.16.34.72 netmask 255.255.255.255

means maps the outside interface to the inside IP using the outside IP to the inside interface.

it would make more sense to have the inside to inside and outside to outside.
0
Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 

Author Comment

by:jdana
ID: 40496714
Jan, Forgive my ignorance, I'm not a network guy. Is it reasonable to simplify this construct with the following "laymanish" statement, "The NAT Rule creates a "pathway" between the firewall's outside interface and the network interface of my server. As long as matching firewall rules exist allowing traffic, the NAT Rule is bi-directional. That is, it facilitates traffic both ways." A NAT rule based on the outside firewall interface would work as well.
0
 
LVL 29

Expert Comment

by:Jan Springer
ID: 40496770
The NAT rule takes a packet destined to an IP address, translates it and forwards the packet to the translated address.

And yes, a rule needs to exist both ways for consistent traffic flow.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:jdana
ID: 40512757
THANKS
0

Featured Post

Guide to Performance: Optimization & Monitoring

Nowadays, monitoring is a mixture of tools, systems, and codes—making it a very complex process. And with this complexity, comes variables for failure. Get DZone’s new Guide to Performance to learn how to proactively find these variables and solve them before a disruption occurs.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

When speed and performance are vital to revenue, companies must have complete confidence in their cloud environment.
During and after that shift to cloud, one area that still poses a struggle for many organizations is what to do with their department file shares.
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
As a trusted technology advisor to your customers you are likely getting the daily question of, ‘should I put this in the cloud?’ As customer demands for cloud services increases, companies will see a shift from traditional buying patterns to new…

707 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question