DLeaver
asked on
10GBE ISCSI direct attached
When I first heard a customer suggest they had been told by a competitor that 10GBE ISCSI directly connecting their two hosts to their SAN was ok, I immediately scoffed and said "not a good idea". When asked "why?" I spluttered a bit and said, "because its not good practice".....scratching my brain further I said, "its encapsulated so it has overhead in comparison [to the direct connect SAS solution we recommended]" ....a pretty weak excuse given that would be true regardless if switches were used.
Aside from that I struggled to think of a good reason. I knew it would work as I have direct connected ISCSI for troubleshooting purposes many times. However for a non scaling DR site (never going to grow beyond the two hosts for this solution) why isn't 10GBE direct connected a good idea?...
Interested in getting some opinions on this one.....
Aside from that I struggled to think of a good reason. I knew it would work as I have direct connected ISCSI for troubleshooting purposes many times. However for a non scaling DR site (never going to grow beyond the two hosts for this solution) why isn't 10GBE direct connected a good idea?...
Interested in getting some opinions on this one.....
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Sounds fine from what you told me, as long as its a cluster.
ASKER
Thanks for the feedback guys, very useful