Solved

Citrix PVS and MCS equivalent in Vmware

Posted on 2014-12-15
9
715 Views
Last Modified: 2016-10-27
Citrix Xendesktop uses PVS and MCS technology, I would like to know what is the equivalent of it in VMware ?
Any help will be very much appreciated.

Thanks
0
Comment
Question by:jskfan
  • 5
  • 3
9 Comments
 
LVL 118

Assisted Solution

by:Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE)
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE) earned 250 total points
ID: 40501452
0
 

Author Comment

by:jskfan
ID: 40501630
So PVS and MCS are equivalent to VMware Composer..
How PVS differ from MCS  using the Analogy of VMware. I have done some reading about PVS and MCS , could not get real difference since I am much more familiar with VMware than Citrix...
Can someone describe the difference between PVS and MCS using the analogy of VMware ?
0
 
LVL 118
ID: 40501637
So PVS and MCS are equivalent to VMware Composer..

Correct.

How PVS differ from MCS  using the Analogy of VMware. I have done some reading about PVS and MCS , could not get real difference since I am much more familiar with VMware than Citrix...
Can someone describe the difference between PVS and MCS using the analogy of VMware ?

Did you watch the videos ? The comparison is shown?
0
 

Author Comment

by:jskfan
ID: 40501663
I meant the comparison between PVS and MCS
0
Get up to 2TB FREE CLOUD per backup license!

An exclusive Black Friday offer just for Expert Exchange audience! Buy any of our top-rated backup solutions & get up to 2TB free cloud per system! Perform local & cloud backup in the same step, and restore instantly—anytime, anywhere. Grab this deal now before it disappears!

 
LVL 118
ID: 40501684
PVS is an old technology requiring different infrastructure, it's based on PXE boot (network) for provisioning. This technology has been around for many years, we've been using this sort of technology for use with thin clients, boot PROM networking boots from OS etc

MCS was created in 2010, and is similar to VMware's approach with Composer and the use of Linked Clones, it's integrated into the product, uses space saving technologies. e.g. space reclamation, and uses cache based technologies.
0
 

Author Comment

by:jskfan
ID: 40501729
http://www.barryschiffer.com/provisioning-services-vs-machine-creation-services-2014-revision/

I was reading the blog in the above Link, and they put a diagram (the second one down the page):
http://i0.wp.com/www.barryschiffer.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/PVSvsMCS_2014.jpg

Per the Diagram,
PVS is required if:
- the Target computers are Physical
 -Citrix Version is previous to Xendesktop 7
- Storage Based Read Cache is not used (I have no idea what it means)
- Multiple Image Location is used (No idea what it means)

MCS Can be used:
- If Target computers are Virtual
- Xendesktop 7 or newer version is used
- Storage based read cache is used (No idea what it means)
- Multiple Image Location is not used (No idea what it means)

**I believe the article did not mention that PVS needs a dedicated Machine..
0
 
LVL 23

Accepted Solution

by:
Dirk Kotte earned 250 total points
ID: 40535033
MCS technology is like cloning a device automatically within VMWare.
This use a Master image/snapshot from the hypervisor and create a linked clone for every new device.

PVS uses a master-image existing as VHD file at the PVS server and provide this image via LAN boot to the clientdevices.
This clients can be VM's (desktops or servers) and physical devices too. These devices don't need an own HDD (or vHDD) for booting.
because LAN Boot can collide with other LAN-PXE services (MS SCCM, Acronis, PXE) it is not a bad idea to use separated LAN for PXE traffic.

often i prefer PVS because it is more fast than MCS and the versioning of images and the rollback to a previous image is more simple.  
But creating the initial image and the first transfer to PVS server is more complicated.

... and at some little environments it is an advantage i don't need a storage with PVS
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:jskfan
ID: 40547131
Thank You Guys!
0
 

Author Comment

by:jskfan
ID: 40547647
http://citrixgeeks.com/2013/07/14/configuring-the-citrix-universal-printer/
I guess the link above will apply to recent version of citrix:
Xenapp/Xendesktop 7.6

I opened up Citrix studio and saw the policy mention in the link above.
UPClient , I believe is installed by default when you install Citrix Xenapp/Xendesktop 7.6, so there is no need to configure it.

----Youtube video I posted above , I guess it is for older version of citrix
0

Featured Post

Backup Your Microsoft Windows Server®

Backup all your Microsoft Windows Server – on-premises, in remote locations, in private and hybrid clouds. Your entire Windows Server will be backed up in one easy step with patented, block-level disk imaging. We achieve RTOs (recovery time objectives) as low as 15 seconds.

Join & Write a Comment

HOW TO: Upload an ISO image to a VMware datastore for use with VMware vSphere Hypervisor 6.5 (ESXi 6.5) using the vSphere Host Client, and checking its MD5 checksum signature is correct.  It's a good idea to compare checksums, because many installat…
In this article, I show you step by step with screenshots to assist you - HOW TO: Deploy and Install the VMware vCenter Server Appliance 6.5 (VCSA 6.5), with some helpful tips along the way.
Teach the user how to join ESXi hosts to Active Directory domains Open vSphere Client: Join ESXi host to AD domain: Verify ESXi computer account in AD: Configure permissions for domain user in ESXi: Test domain user login to ESXi host:
Advanced tutorial on how to run the esxtop command to capture a batch file in csv format in order to export the file and use it for performance analysis. He demonstrates how to download the file using a vSphere web client (or vSphere client) and exp…

746 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

12 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now