Citrix PVS and MCS equivalent in Vmware

Citrix Xendesktop uses PVS and MCS technology, I would like to know what is the equivalent of it in VMware ?
Any help will be very much appreciated.

Thanks
jskfanAsked:
Who is Participating?
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)VMware and Virtualization ConsultantCommented:
0
jskfanAuthor Commented:
So PVS and MCS are equivalent to VMware Composer..
How PVS differ from MCS  using the Analogy of VMware. I have done some reading about PVS and MCS , could not get real difference since I am much more familiar with VMware than Citrix...
Can someone describe the difference between PVS and MCS using the analogy of VMware ?
0
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)VMware and Virtualization ConsultantCommented:
So PVS and MCS are equivalent to VMware Composer..

Correct.

How PVS differ from MCS  using the Analogy of VMware. I have done some reading about PVS and MCS , could not get real difference since I am much more familiar with VMware than Citrix...
Can someone describe the difference between PVS and MCS using the analogy of VMware ?

Did you watch the videos ? The comparison is shown?
0
jskfanAuthor Commented:
I meant the comparison between PVS and MCS
0
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)VMware and Virtualization ConsultantCommented:
PVS is an old technology requiring different infrastructure, it's based on PXE boot (network) for provisioning. This technology has been around for many years, we've been using this sort of technology for use with thin clients, boot PROM networking boots from OS etc

MCS was created in 2010, and is similar to VMware's approach with Composer and the use of Linked Clones, it's integrated into the product, uses space saving technologies. e.g. space reclamation, and uses cache based technologies.
0
jskfanAuthor Commented:
http://www.barryschiffer.com/provisioning-services-vs-machine-creation-services-2014-revision/

I was reading the blog in the above Link, and they put a diagram (the second one down the page):
http://i0.wp.com/www.barryschiffer.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/PVSvsMCS_2014.jpg

Per the Diagram,
PVS is required if:
- the Target computers are Physical
 -Citrix Version is previous to Xendesktop 7
- Storage Based Read Cache is not used (I have no idea what it means)
- Multiple Image Location is used (No idea what it means)

MCS Can be used:
- If Target computers are Virtual
- Xendesktop 7 or newer version is used
- Storage based read cache is used (No idea what it means)
- Multiple Image Location is not used (No idea what it means)

**I believe the article did not mention that PVS needs a dedicated Machine..
0
Dirk KotteSECommented:
MCS technology is like cloning a device automatically within VMWare.
This use a Master image/snapshot from the hypervisor and create a linked clone for every new device.

PVS uses a master-image existing as VHD file at the PVS server and provide this image via LAN boot to the clientdevices.
This clients can be VM's (desktops or servers) and physical devices too. These devices don't need an own HDD (or vHDD) for booting.
because LAN Boot can collide with other LAN-PXE services (MS SCCM, Acronis, PXE) it is not a bad idea to use separated LAN for PXE traffic.

often i prefer PVS because it is more fast than MCS and the versioning of images and the rollback to a previous image is more simple.  
But creating the initial image and the first transfer to PVS server is more complicated.

... and at some little environments it is an advantage i don't need a storage with PVS
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
jskfanAuthor Commented:
Thank You Guys!
0
jskfanAuthor Commented:
http://citrixgeeks.com/2013/07/14/configuring-the-citrix-universal-printer/
I guess the link above will apply to recent version of citrix:
Xenapp/Xendesktop 7.6

I opened up Citrix studio and saw the policy mention in the link above.
UPClient , I believe is installed by default when you install Citrix Xenapp/Xendesktop 7.6, so there is no need to configure it.

----Youtube video I posted above , I guess it is for older version of citrix
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
VMware

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.