• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 2862
  • Last Modified:

What is the proper order of installation for IIS, SQL Server, and Visual Studio?

Please tell me which of the following (A, B, or C) is a proper installation order. My apology in advance for second guessing the inputs from the experts in the following links.

Question: What is the proper order of of installation for IIS, SQL Server, and Visual Studio?

Option C is my choice with explanations included. Please correct me and tell me why C is not correct.

Option A as discussed at http://www.experts-exchange.com/Programming/Languages/.NET/Q_28580506.html , the order is:
A1. Visual Studio
A2. IIS
A3. SQL Server

Option B as discussed at http://www.experts-exchange.com/Programming/Languages/.NET/Q_28580435.html which suggests order like:
B1. IIS
B2. Visual Studio
B3. SQL Server

Option C, my personal choice with open mind to learn. I have include explanations with each step:
C1. IIS                        <-- is required by both SQL Server (for SSRS) and Visual Studio.
C2. SQL Server        <-- it better to install SQL Sever prior to Visual Studio despite the fact
                                                   recent Visual Studio include SQL Server (compact version) internally.
C3. Visual Studio    <-- Finally Visual Studio

Revised:
From : http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj248684.aspx it seems to suggest the followings:
D1: IIS                            <-- I will install whatever the defaule IIS is in my computer.
D2: Wisual Studio       <-- I will install vs  2013 Ultimate
D3: SQL Server            <-- I will install SQL Server 2014 Developer

Reading more, I see that SSRS has nothing to do with IIS in native mode. But in the integrated mode (with sharepoint and because sharepoint has dependency on IIS), SSRS has indirect dependency with IIS.

Bottom line, because I will be doing SSRS in native mode and Visual Studio has it internal IIS (IIS Express?), I do not need to worry about IIS for now. However, later on I suppose when I am ready for sharepoint, I can configure IIS along with whatever sharepoint needs.

With IIS out of this list. it seems I can install SQL Server and VS 2013 in any order (preferably VS 2013 last).
Question 2: Does my assessment makes sense? Is it accurate?
0
Mike Eghtebas
Asked:
Mike Eghtebas
4 Solutions
 
Vitor MontalvãoMSSQL Senior EngineerCommented:
It would be better to install each feature in separated computers but if you cant' then IIS should be the first to be installed and for Visual Studio and SQL Server the order is not relevant.
0
 
colly92002Commented:
Having created lmanu many dev servers with your configuration, I honestly don't think it matters what order you install things in.

When you come to install Sharepoint it is another matter - you should start completely from scratch and follow the instructions.  Integrating SSRS with Sharepoint can be a bit of a challenge if you are not sure what you are doing.
0
 
Miguel OzSoftware EngineerCommented:
If needed in the same computer, I will install SQL server 2014 first and then VS2013.
The only reason: BI/SSMS is based on VS2012 which is an old version of VS.
0
 
colly92002Commented:
BIDS should not conflict with Visual Studio, so you should be OK.  You can always install BIDS separately from SQL Server after you have installed VS if you really need to.
0
 
Mike EghtebasDatabase and Application DeveloperAuthor Commented:
Miguel,

But we have: SQL Server 2014 Business Intelligence 32-bit (English)  1 GB

Then I do SQL Server 2014 Developer, then vs 2013, and late BI version of SQL Server 2014

In your opinion, is this a good plan?
0

Featured Post

Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now