Solved

Migration to Exchange 2013 SP1 - Edge Transport Role

Posted on 2014-12-19
6
305 Views
Last Modified: 2014-12-22
We're planning on moving to Exchange 2013 SP1. From all the information I could find, it seems that the Edge Transport role is to be placed in the perimeter network for incoming SMTP traffic. My question is, let's say the CAS role (along with the Mailbox Server role) resides on our internal network - do Outlook 2010/2013 users that connect to our organization from the outside do so through the Edge Transport server, or would they connect directly to our internal corporate LAN where the CAS is hosted?

And if they connect directly to out internal corporate LAN where our CAS is hosted, is there a way to force that traffic instead to go through the Edge Tranport server first, or would the CAS role also have to be installed on our perimeter network for this to work?

Basically, we would prefer that any traffic coming through the outside goes through our DMZ first. We would like to avoid having to open any port to our corporate LAN. I really appreciate any insight someone could offer into this. Thanks.

- Dave
0
Comment
Question by:glass81
6 Comments
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:Ivan
ID: 40510253
Hi,

as I know Edge is only there for SMTP flow, meaning that only email coming or going to your organization will go thru it.
Client connections for Outlook Anywhere, POP3, IMAP will go directly to CAS, so you would have to open SSL and any other required port.

Edge is not a part of AD domain, so it cannot authenticate clients. Clients are authenticated and then proxy from CAS to Mailbox.

Regards,
0
 

Author Comment

by:glass81
ID: 40510349
So there's no way to accept connections for CAS from the edge transport server - kind of like routing all requests through there first? Maybe I'm off base here, but it sounds convenient to have port 443 open on the edge transport server as opposed to opening it directly on your internal corporate LAN.
0
 
LVL 63

Accepted Solution

by:
Simon Butler (Sembee) earned 500 total points
ID: 40510650
Edge is a waste of money in my opinion, for exactly the reasons you have identified - it only does SMTP traffic. It has nothing to do with any other role. Therefore I never deploy one. I can achieve 90% of the functionality of Edge with third party products, and usually get more functionality that Edge cannot provide from those same products.

Most deployments I do will bring port 443 straight in to Exchange. Putting it through a DMZ does nothing for security. If you have a 1990s security policy that states nothing internal should be exposed to the internet, then use a separate server to do ARR.

The Exchange product team has outlined how to do that for Exchange 2013 here:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2013/07/19/reverse-proxy-for-exchange-server-2013-using-iis-arr-part-1.aspx

Also, I wouldn't be deploying Exchange 2013 SP1. That is very old now (effectively CU 4). New deployments should go straight to CU7. The cumulative updates are the complete product, so just download it from the public site, extract and install.

Simon.
0
What is SQL Server and how does it work?

The purpose of this paper is to provide you background on SQL Server. It’s your self-study guide for learning fundamentals. It includes both the history of SQL and its technical basics. Concepts and definitions will form the solid foundation of your future DBA expertise.

 
LVL 31

Expert Comment

by:Gareth Gudger
ID: 40510818
I agree with Simon. And if I could give him a +1 I would. ;)

There are a number of reverse proxies on the market. Many doing double duty as load balancers as well. ARR is a great free alternative from Microsoft. But it requires a server in the DMZ with IIS installed.
0
 

Author Comment

by:glass81
ID: 40513439
Unfortunately Simon, we kind of do have that type of network. I understand that if our server hosting ARR is compromised in the DMZ, it would be just as bad as having our CAS compromised on our internal network.

I can't convince the IT Director otherwise, but I do appreciate the clarification, and ultimately, your help on this topic.
0
 
LVL 31

Expert Comment

by:Gareth Gudger
ID: 40513443
If they don't want to go with ARR, then you could look at a reverse proxy / load balancer like a KEMP.
http://kemptechnologies.com/solutions/reverse-proxy/

They offer them as hardware or virtual models.
0

Featured Post

PRTG Network Monitor: Intuitive Network Monitoring

Network Monitoring is essential to ensure that computer systems and network devices are running. Use PRTG to monitor LANs, servers, websites, applications and devices, bandwidth, virtual environments, remote systems, IoT, and many more. PRTG is easy to set up & use.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Read this checklist to learn more about the 15 things you should never include in an email signature.
Scenario: Your operations manager has discovered an anomaly in your security system. The business will start to suffer within 15 minutes if it is a major IT incident. What should she do? We have 6 recommendations for managing major incidents (https:…
To show how to generate a certificate request in Exchange 2013. We show this process by using the Exchange Admin Center. Log into Exchange Admin Center.:  First we need to log into the Exchange Admin Center. Navigate to the Servers >> Certificates…
The basic steps you have just learned will be implemented in this video. The basic steps are shown to configure an Exchange DAG in a live working Exchange Server Environment and manage the same (Exchange Server 2010 Software is used in a Windows Ser…

895 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

14 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now