Is your banking experience now improving?

Posted on 2014-12-22
Medium Priority
Last Modified: 2015-01-03

Is your banking experience now improving?

[re: your tax dollars at work]
With passage of US budget (and 'associated' add-on bills other than to assist veterans)

Better interest on Deposits?
Better interest on mortgage?
Improved economy?
Other (something else)?

__________________________________[for optional perusal]__
Republican Senator Kills Veteran Suicide Prevention Bill That Passed House Unanimously
The VA estimates that 22 veterans commit suicide every day. Outgoing Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn says it costs too much and stopped the bill from coming up for a vote.

With Dodd-Frank Rollback, The Big Bad Banks Are Back
http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2014/12/12/with-dodd-frank-rollback-the-big-bad-banks-are-back/ - 12/12/2014  - Steve Denning
..the bill also contained a provision, said to be written by Citigroup ($11,543,276), repealing a key part of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The provision enables the big banks once again to use insured deposits and other taxpayer subsidies and guarantees to gamble in the derivatives markets—the very type of business that drove the 2008 financial crisis and the economic devastation that followed.

Wall Street’s business model depends on the ability of large financial conglomerates to keep exploiting the cheap funding provided by their ‘too big to fail’ subsidies,

Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan Chase CEO, also personally lobbied ($12,157,587) lawmakers on the bill.

Wall Street vs The People

As to why Congress is acting on behalf of the financial sector against the interests of the country as a whole, one doesn’t have to look far. “In the current election cycle, Wall Street banks and financial interests have so far reported spending more than $1.2 billion to influence decision-making in Washington, according to an updated report by Americans for Financial Reform. That works out to just under $1.8 million a day. It represents an average of about $2.3 million spent to elect or influence each of the 535 members of the Senate and House of Representatives.”

Lest we forget why we had a financial crisis in 2008

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/12/us/congress-spending-bill.html?_r=0 - By ASHLEY PARKER and ROBERT PEAR - DEC. 11, 2014

China is creating a new "World Bank".
Russia's seizure of Ukrainian banks in Crimea is still wreaking havoc with locals' finances
Global banks agree to pay $4.3 billion for manipulating currency markets
http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21632645-global-banks-agree-pay-43-billion-manipulating-currency-markets-fixed?zid=300&ah=e7b9370e170850b88ef129fa625b13c4 - Nov 15th 2014
Question by:SunBow
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
1 Comment
LVL 27

Accepted Solution

tliotta earned 200 total points
ID: 40517543
At the start of July 2012, I submitted my 30-day resignation notice. I had enough stashed away that I figured I could afford a year off without affecting eventual retirement, etc., and do some things I wanted to do. I expected about nine full months before I'd need to think seriously about going back to work, while expecting a three-month time before actually obtaining work. I also figured maybe a six-month margin of error for finances beyond that.

As it turned out, I went a full two years before starting to feel I should begin to do something. It's now been close to two and a half years, and only during the past three months have I started work that resulted in billings. My "stash" is down to a point where it could probably carry me (well, 'us', including my wife) another six months. The "stash" did well enough that "nine months" turned into better than two years.

Only a minority portion was directly involved in common interest-bearing activities, i.e., directly related to 'banking'. That was mostly for simple risk reduction and was mostly in a couple mutual funds.

IMO, the only times that 'banking' for interest concerns should be relevant are when accounts are so large that the interest forms a critical part of income. I.e., if you're rich enough to live off of interest, it makes sense to put effort into watching it. Otherwise, 'banking' ought to be viewed as a service to you. Interest as income should commonly be a trivial concern.

More to the point, I'm not sure that derivatives are a bad thing per se. IMO, it's more a problem of not auditing to track the health of underlying securities. It's when the values of those securities are overstated (especially knowingly) and no one does anything about it that problems show up. But otherwise I'm fine with them. Let banks work with them. Just check on them periodically as should have always been done.


Featured Post

New benefit for Premium Members - Upgrade now!

Ready to get started with anonymous questions today? It's easy! Learn more.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Learn more about the importance of email disclaimers with our top 10 email disclaimer DOs and DON’Ts.
Get an idea of what you should include in an email disclaimer with these Top 5 email disclaimer tips.
Visualize your data even better in Access queries. Given a date and a value, this lesson shows how to compare that value with the previous value, calculate the difference, and display a circle if the value is the same, an up triangle if it increased…
Want to learn how to record your desktop screen without having to use an outside camera. Click on this video and learn how to use the cool google extension called "Screencastify"! Step 1: Open a new google tab Step 2: Go to the left hand upper corn…

718 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question