• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 61
  • Last Modified:

Load Balancing

Hi , We are planning to have few servers having quite a few windows services and they all are connected to an oracle Database.

All these services read input records from the database and process it further.

Is there anyway to assign fixed number of input records to each server ? We have F5 as the load balancer.

For example  : If there are 3 servers and 100 input records then Server 1 gets 33 Server 2 gets 33 and Server 3 gets 34 records to process.

Your advice would be helpful.
0
Satyakam Acharya
Asked:
Satyakam Acharya
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • +2
1 Solution
 
David Johnson, CD, MVPOwnerCommented:
That is not how things will work, you will have to manually split the requests.  Load Balancing goes from 1 to many not many to one.

If you have the Oracle server going to the load balancer to the servers it will connect to 1 (one) server only
0
 
DavidSenior Oracle Database AdministratorCommented:
Obviously 100 records is just an example, but it's hard to comment without facts.  Enterprise Oracle, presumably.  Are the servers on the same rack, or in different countries?  Are you running Oracle clustering (RAC)?  Are you running 11i or 12c?  Was this question not considered by the data architect before acquiring the hardware????

You specifically asked for a fixed number of records to be pre-assigned -- what happens when your input load unexpectedly goes from 100 to 10,000?
0
 
Alexander Eßer [Alex140181]Software DeveloperCommented:
In general I'd agree with David, but if you take a RAC cluster as some kind of load balancing, then there would be several Oracle (RAC) instances dealing with e.g. 1 SQL statement....
0
Get your Disaster Recovery as a Service basics

Disaster Recovery as a Service is one go-to solution that revolutionizes DR planning. Implementing DRaaS could be an efficient process, easily accessible to non-DR experts. Learn about monitoring, testing, executing failovers and failbacks to ensure a "healthy" DR environment.

 
Mark GeerlingsDatabase AdministratorCommented:
Where is the load balancer in relation to the users, the Windows servers and the Oracle database?  Is it between the users and the Windows servers?  Or, is it between the Windows servers and the Oracle database?  Is the database on a single server?  Or, is the database clustered onto multiple machines?

Also, is this a purchased application that may come with some server and/or hardware recommendations?  Or, is this a custom application that you are building from scratch?  Do you have some current data to work with like: number of user connections, numbers of transactions or queries per hour or per day, etc.?  Or, is this a new system that you are estimating load on?
0
 
Satyakam AcharyaAuthor Commented:
Am sorry my bad the application was handed over to me yesterday. So here are the details and statistics
There is no load balancer as of now
The application is currently having one active server and one passive server each running the same set of windows services in batch/scheduled mode.

The services read records from the oracle DB and then process the records and the update the DB accordingly.

Currently as of now, the application gets around 30,000 records to be processed which takes around 2 hrs to process.
Now we want to improve the performance of the same. We found the CPU of the current server is nearly maxed out  and hence we were thinking of couple of new servers. Hence we are thinking is there any way to balance the load for these batch service based on the number of records to be processed ?
0
 
Mark GeerlingsDatabase AdministratorCommented:
Are your Windows servers separate from the Oracle database server(s)?  Or, is the Oracle database also on the Windows servers?

What kind of processing of these records do the application servers do?  Is it possible to move that processing to PL\SQL (or possibly Java) procedures inside the database instead?
0
 
DavidSenior Oracle Database AdministratorCommented:
Is the current server physically maxed out, one cannot add CPU, RAM, etc.?  Cheaper than adding more servers.  How many processors?  Are the processes running with PARALLEL enabled and tuned?

What is the SPECIFIC data flow?  Does record processing mean simple ETL such as datapump or bulk inserts, or more like specific data manipulation and computation.

Is the system and the database tuned?  Are the cost-based optimizer (CBO) statistics kept up to date after each load cycle?
0
 
David Johnson, CD, MVPOwnerCommented:
Memory  SQL likes lots of memory for itself 16G+,and lots of available IOPS you need fast disks (SSD) .. Putting the database on a RAID 1 SSD array will greatly improve things.. My preference is (a) don't put database files on the system disk or any disk with a pagefile.
(b) put database / logs on different physical drives.
without changing anything just using the 2 above suggestions will improve things tremendously
0

Featured Post

New feature and membership benefit!

New feature! Upgrade and increase expert visibility of your issues with Priority Questions.

  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • +2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now