Solved

Tuning TCP parameters to maximise throughput - Windows 2003 and 2008

Posted on 2014-12-30
7
346 Views
Last Modified: 2015-01-12
Got 3 servers, A (Win 2008), B (Win 2003), and C (Win 2003) with network timeout issues between them.

Been testing with iperf and using various tcp window sizes.

A to B - works fine -high speed.
A to C  - worksfine - high speed.
B to C - very slow. Increase in TCP windows size in iperf makes difference (But still not as fast as previous 2).

B to A - very very slow. Increase in TCP window size in iperf makes big difference.
C to A - same.
C to B - same.

I can sort of understand why B to C is slow (both are Windows 2003). These have not had TCP parameters tuned at all which I understand is possible on Windows 2003. My plan was to try increasing the TCP window size on these servers.

But B to A is from 2003 to destination of Windows 2008. I thought TCP was all sorted in 2008 and there was nothing to tune?
0
Comment
Question by:paul williams
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • +1
7 Comments
 

Author Comment

by:paul williams
ID: 40523389
Ah. Would this by why? 2003 to 2008......

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/983528
0
 
LVL 42

Expert Comment

by:kevinhsieh
ID: 40524796
Is it too much to ask to just ditch Windows 2003? It's been around a long time and the end of support is very near. Not exactly a solution, but it's getting time to say goodbye. Networking in the later versions of Windows is greatly improved. I can actually push 1 GBs with the newer versions of Windows.
0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:pgm554
ID: 40524868
Is this over a WAN ,or LAN?
0
Are your AD admin tools letting you down?

Managing Active Directory can get complicated.  Often, the native tools for managing AD are just not up to the task.  The largest Active Directory installations in the world have relied on one tool to manage their day-to-day administration tasks: Hyena. Start your trial today.

 
LVL 24

Expert Comment

by:Dirk Kotte
ID: 40525135
hi paul,
we need some more details ...

first - same network segment or routed
second - the question from pgm554: WAN or LAN connections
what do you mean with "works fine -high speed" and "very very slow"

i would suggest to not use iperf at the first steps.
copy a big file from one server to the other and look to the taskmanagers network-load. copy the file from the other server back to your server and look to the taskmanagers throughput.
post the results please.
if the difference from one direction to the other is really big (>50%) you have other problems than windows size. If one direction is OK, i think WS is not your problem. Changing WS is an option to optimize the throughput at WAN links but not the local LAN. Good description and calculation at http://bradhedlund.com/2008/12/19/how-to-calculate-tcp-throughput-for-long-distance-links/

We can search and find these errors if you provide us with many details as possible.
0
 
LVL 30

Assisted Solution

by:pgm554
pgm554 earned 250 total points
ID: 40525698
Here's my goto on tuning older versions of Windows:

http://www.psc.edu/index.php/networking/641-tcp-tune#WindowsXP
0
 

Author Comment

by:paul williams
ID: 40531204
Routed.
WAN
Fast is 600mbps, slow is under 10.
0
 
LVL 24

Accepted Solution

by:
Dirk Kotte earned 250 total points
ID: 40532940
you have a 1GBit WAN connection, between 3 locations, right?
at every location you have one server?
Which type of WAN do you use (dark fibre, provider MPLS, ...)
what are the latencies (or ping times) from
A to B
A to C
B to C
and the opposite direction?

if the lowness occurs only if WAN connections affected (within the locations the copy from server to client and backwards are fast?) the MTU is a possible problem too.
try reduce the MTU radical (i use MTU of 800 or 1000 for testing)

another possible problem is duplex mismatch. it is typical if one direction is fast the other very slow.
you should select the automatic duplex settings at all ports (servers,switches,routers, ... and VMWare also if used)
with wireshark you should see packet retransmissions...
0

Featured Post

Optimizing Cloud Backup for Low Bandwidth

With cloud storage prices going down a growing number of SMBs start to use it for backup storage. Unfortunately, business data volume rarely fits the average Internet speed. This article provides an overview of main Internet speed challenges and reveals backup best practices.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Configuring network clients can be a chore, especially if there are a large number of them or a lot of itinerant users.  DHCP dynamically manages this process, much to the relief of users and administrators alike!
Restoring deleted objects in Active Directory has been a standard feature in Active Directory for many years, yet some admins may not know what is available.
This tutorial will show how to configure a new Backup Exec 2012 server and move an existing database to that server with the use of the BEUtility. Install Backup Exec 2012 on the new server and apply all of the latest hotfixes and service packs. The…
This tutorial will show how to configure a single USB drive with a separate folder for each day of the week. This will allow each of the backups to be kept separate preventing the previous day’s backup from being overwritten. The USB drive must be s…

734 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question