Solved

Tuning TCP parameters to maximise throughput - Windows 2003 and 2008

Posted on 2014-12-30
7
356 Views
Last Modified: 2015-01-12
Got 3 servers, A (Win 2008), B (Win 2003), and C (Win 2003) with network timeout issues between them.

Been testing with iperf and using various tcp window sizes.

A to B - works fine -high speed.
A to C  - worksfine - high speed.
B to C - very slow. Increase in TCP windows size in iperf makes difference (But still not as fast as previous 2).

B to A - very very slow. Increase in TCP window size in iperf makes big difference.
C to A - same.
C to B - same.

I can sort of understand why B to C is slow (both are Windows 2003). These have not had TCP parameters tuned at all which I understand is possible on Windows 2003. My plan was to try increasing the TCP window size on these servers.

But B to A is from 2003 to destination of Windows 2008. I thought TCP was all sorted in 2008 and there was nothing to tune?
0
Comment
Question by:paul williams
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • +1
7 Comments
 

Author Comment

by:paul williams
ID: 40523389
Ah. Would this by why? 2003 to 2008......

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/983528
0
 
LVL 42

Expert Comment

by:kevinhsieh
ID: 40524796
Is it too much to ask to just ditch Windows 2003? It's been around a long time and the end of support is very near. Not exactly a solution, but it's getting time to say goodbye. Networking in the later versions of Windows is greatly improved. I can actually push 1 GBs with the newer versions of Windows.
0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:pgm554
ID: 40524868
Is this over a WAN ,or LAN?
0
What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

 
LVL 24

Expert Comment

by:Dirk Kotte
ID: 40525135
hi paul,
we need some more details ...

first - same network segment or routed
second - the question from pgm554: WAN or LAN connections
what do you mean with "works fine -high speed" and "very very slow"

i would suggest to not use iperf at the first steps.
copy a big file from one server to the other and look to the taskmanagers network-load. copy the file from the other server back to your server and look to the taskmanagers throughput.
post the results please.
if the difference from one direction to the other is really big (>50%) you have other problems than windows size. If one direction is OK, i think WS is not your problem. Changing WS is an option to optimize the throughput at WAN links but not the local LAN. Good description and calculation at http://bradhedlund.com/2008/12/19/how-to-calculate-tcp-throughput-for-long-distance-links/

We can search and find these errors if you provide us with many details as possible.
0
 
LVL 30

Assisted Solution

by:pgm554
pgm554 earned 250 total points
ID: 40525698
Here's my goto on tuning older versions of Windows:

http://www.psc.edu/index.php/networking/641-tcp-tune#WindowsXP
0
 

Author Comment

by:paul williams
ID: 40531204
Routed.
WAN
Fast is 600mbps, slow is under 10.
0
 
LVL 24

Accepted Solution

by:
Dirk Kotte earned 250 total points
ID: 40532940
you have a 1GBit WAN connection, between 3 locations, right?
at every location you have one server?
Which type of WAN do you use (dark fibre, provider MPLS, ...)
what are the latencies (or ping times) from
A to B
A to C
B to C
and the opposite direction?

if the lowness occurs only if WAN connections affected (within the locations the copy from server to client and backwards are fast?) the MTU is a possible problem too.
try reduce the MTU radical (i use MTU of 800 or 1000 for testing)

another possible problem is duplex mismatch. it is typical if one direction is fast the other very slow.
you should select the automatic duplex settings at all ports (servers,switches,routers, ... and VMWare also if used)
with wireshark you should see packet retransmissions...
0

Featured Post

Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

You might have come across a situation when you have Exchange 2013 server in two different sites (Production and DR). After adding the Database copy in ECP console it displays Database copy status unknown for the DR exchange server. Issue is strange…
I was prompted to write this article after the recent World-Wide Ransomware outbreak. For years now, System Administrators around the world have used the excuse of "Waiting a Bit" before applying Security Patch Updates. This type of reasoning to me …
This Micro Tutorial hows how you can integrate  Mac OSX to a Windows Active Directory Domain. Apple has made it easy to allow users to bind their macs to a windows domain with relative ease. The following video show how to bind OSX Mavericks to …
There are cases when e.g. an IT administrator wants to have full access and view into selected mailboxes on Exchange server, directly from his own email account in Outlook or Outlook Web Access. This proves useful when for example administrator want…
Suggested Courses

623 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question