Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

Oracle SQL AVG

Posted on 2014-12-31
2
Medium Priority
?
178 Views
Last Modified: 2014-12-31
I have a little confusion with this.
Here is the situation.
There are tables:
PROJEKAT (PROJECT)
with attributes:
SPR (ID FOR PROJECT)
NAP (NAME OF PROJECT)
NAR (ID OF COMPANY WHO ORDERED PROJECT - CUSTOMER)
RUK (ID OF PROJECT MANAGER)

and table:
RADPROJ (EMPLOYEE_PROJECT)
with attributes:
SPR (ID OF PROJECT)
MBR (ID OF EMPLOYEE WORKING ON PROJECT)
BRC (NUMBER OF WORKING HOURS PER PROJECT PER EMPLOYEE)

I was writing a query to get ID of projects at which average working hours are bigger than average working hours on ALL projects.
And here is how it looks like:
--first solution
select rp.spr, p.nap, avg (rp.brc), (select avg (rp.brc) from radproj rp)
from radproj rp, projekat p
where rp.spr = p.spr
group by rp.spr, p.nap
having  avg (rp.brc) > (select avg (rp.brc) from radproj rp );

Open in new window


and it works OK, it yields results:
2      Skladistenje      13      11,15384615384615384615384615384615384615
5      Dijete      15,625      11,15384615384615384615384615384615384615

But to my big surprise this query as well gives same result:
-- second solution
SELECT p.spr, p.nap, AVG(rp.brc), AVG(rp1.brc)
FROM radproj rp, radproj rp1, projekat p
WHERE rp.spr=p.spr
GROUP BY p.spr, p.nap
HAVING AVG(rp.brc)>AVG(rp1.brc);

Open in new window


My question is how come that in second solution
AVG(rp.brc) gives average working hours per employee on project (as it should), but then second AVG(rp1.brc) which is basically exactly the same as first AVG function doesn't give the same but it "figures out" and give exactly what I need and tat is AVG working hours for ALL projects? Why the second AVG(rp1.brc) have not to be in (select avg (rp.brc) from radproj rp) format? What do I miss here?


Whole schema look like this:
Untitled.pngSchema is as:
Radnik({mbr,prz,ime,plt,god,sef,sodel,srm},{mbr})
Projekat({spr,nap,nar,ruk},{spr})
Radproj({spr,mbr,brc},{spr+mbr})
Odeljenje({sodel,nazod,lok},{sodel})
Radnomesto({srm,naz},{srm})

and referential integrities are:
Radnik[sef]Radnik[mbr]
Radnik[sodel]Odeljenje[sodel]
Radnik[srm]Radnomesto[srm]
Projekat[ruk]Radnik[mbr]
Radproj[spr]Projekat[spr]
Radproj[mbr]Radnik[mbr]

And whole radnikprojekat-tabele.sql script for creating all tables is in attachment.
radnikprojekat-tabele.sql
0
Comment
Question by:KPax
2 Comments
 
LVL 29

Accepted Solution

by:
MikeOM_DBA earned 2000 total points
ID: 40525755
The reason is a cartesian product of the "radproj rp1," table which does not have any join conditions.
;)
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:KPax
ID: 40525794
Yes, you are right. It is very obvious.
I figured it out later, but left open question anyway.
Thank for answer.
0

Featured Post

Concerto's Cloud Advisory Services

Want to avoid the missteps to gaining all the benefits of the cloud? Learn more about the different assessment options from our Cloud Advisory team.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Configuring and using Oracle Database Gateway for ODBC Introduction First, a brief summary of what a Database Gateway is.  A Gateway is a set of driver agents and configurations that allow an Oracle database to communicate with other platforms…
How to Unravel a Tricky Query Introduction If you browse through the Oracle zones or any of the other database-related zones you'll come across some complicated solutions and sometimes you'll just have to wonder how anyone came up with them.  …
This videos aims to give the viewer a basic demonstration of how a user can query current session information by using the SYS_CONTEXT function
This video shows how to copy an entire tablespace from one database to another database using Transportable Tablespace functionality.

916 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question