Solved

Ideal RAID configuration

Posted on 2015-01-02
9
283 Views
Last Modified: 2015-01-04
Hi all,

What is the ideal RAID configuration for a server that will work as domain controller,  web server and file sharing.  Thr server will serve 10-15 users.

Thank you
0
Comment
Question by:goldenstar
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
9 Comments
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:Shaik M. Sajid
ID: 40528850
raid 5 is best.. for small users...  if u have only 3 hdd's  here u have 1 parity disk.. (if 1 fails your server is still alive)

if u have 4 HDD's u can choose  Raid 6 (here u have 2 parity disks.. (if 2 fails your server is still alive)

or(if u have 4 HDD's) if u need more speed and performance go for Raid 10 (it's a combination of Raid 1+0 here u have 2 fail over disks.. and it's faster in performance comparing to raid 5 & 6
0
 
LVL 24

Expert Comment

by:NVIT
ID: 40528891
If you decide on larger capacity drives, they take longer to rebuild. For those, I'd probably lean towards RAID10.
0
 
LVL 88

Accepted Solution

by:
rindi earned 500 total points
ID: 40528981
I don't agree with the above comment of using RAID 5. On the contrary, that is one of the worst RAID configs. If a RAID 5 array fails, it is at risk during the rebuild, during which all kinds of things can go wrong. The rebuilds usually take long, which means you are at that risk for a longer period of time. Besides that, it is easier to make human errors with that type of array, which also risks your data.

RAID 5 may have made some sense some years ago when disks had a low capacity and were expensive. With RAID 5 you could get the maximum usable space out of a limited number of low capacity disks, while still having some redundancy.

With today's TB disk sizes, and their low price, I'd recommend RAID 1 with a hot-spare, it is far more reliable and much easier to manage than RAID 5, and human errors are less likely, or if you need high performance, then as in the comment above, use RAID 10 (also with a hot-spare).
0
Online Training Solution

Drastically shorten your training time with WalkMe's advanced online training solution that Guides your trainees to action. Forget about retraining and skyrocket knowledge retention rates.

 
LVL 24

Expert Comment

by:VB ITS
ID: 40528983
Seeing as this will be a pretty crucial server I would go with RAID10 if funds permit. Otherwise RAID5 would be the next best option. I am trying to avoid recommending RAID5 these days though as rebuilds get risky as mentioned by rindi above.
0
 
LVL 2

Expert Comment

by:phil435
ID: 40529104
Are you trying to spec a server or do you already have the server with the drives and need to know what raid level? If you already have the drives what is the number of drives, size, and speed? DC's are typically low IO requirements especially with 10-15 users.

I would stay away as mentioned above from raid-5 as its not recommend anymore by most manufacturers.
0
 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:Glenn M
ID: 40529107
RAID 5 is the worst performer. For small business applications like this we always suggest two arrays. A RAID 1 boot array with a pair of fast drives (SAS 15K) for the OS, then a RAID 10 data array for everything else (10K SAS drives are usually fine here).

Stay away from SATA drives as they are dogs in terms of performance even for a small network of 10-15 users.
0
 
LVL 88

Expert Comment

by:rindi
ID: 40529117
One thing you should consider is to virtualize your servers, and good practice also calls for you to use separate server installations for your tasks (the DC should only be a DC, The file server should also be separate, and the web-server, if it is meant as a public web-server, should be on a separate LAN in a DMZ anyway).
0
 

Author Comment

by:goldenstar
ID: 40529860
Thanks all for sharing your ideas. Really appreciate it
0
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:Shaik M. Sajid
ID: 40529941
Mr. Rindi is right but when u have 3 HDD's and u need maximum of space with redundant feature.. the raid 5 i'll prefer...

best regards
0

Featured Post

Flexible connectivity for any environment

The KE6900 series can extend and deploy computers with high definition displays across multiple stations in a variety of applications that suit any environment. Expand computer use to stations across multiple rooms with dynamic access.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
VMware vNUMA question for SQL Server VM on Intel CPU ? 6 219
Cannot see all of hard drive on HP Server 7 77
Troubleshooting MDT 13 74
Windows Server failure RAID 31 110
Why pager replacement is still an issue OnPage has what some might call a “hate/hate” relationship with pagers. Not much room for love. As we see it, pagers are an antiquated bit of technology. Pagers are dinosaurs which, like most dinosaurs, sho…
Dramatic changes are revolutionizing how we build and use technology. Every company is automating, digitizing, and modernizing operations. We need a better, more connected way to work together as teams so we can harness the insights from our system…
The Email Laundry PDF encryption service allows companies to send confidential encrypted  emails to anybody. The PDF document can also contain attachments that are embedded in the encrypted PDF. The password is randomly generated by The Email Laundr…
Finds all prime numbers in a range requested and places them in a public primes() array. I've demostrated a template size of 30 (2 * 3 * 5) but larger templates can be built such 210  (2 * 3 * 5 * 7) or 2310  (2 * 3 * 5 * 7 * 11). The larger templa…

751 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question