Improve company productivity with a Business Account.Sign Up

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 789
  • Last Modified:

Buffer I/O error on device sdb, sdc, sdd, sde, sdf, sdg, sdi - Oracle VM 3.2.8

Version 3.2.8 of OVM. Get these errors when rebooting VM Server. Rebooting takes about 20 mins.

 
Clip from /var/log/messages:-

Jan  7 10:45:04 svr440 kernel: Buffer I/O error on device sdi, logical block 31457251

Jan  7 10:45:04 svr440 kernel: Buffer I/O error on device sdi, logical block 31457252

Jan  7 10:45:04 svr440 kernel: sd 9:0:0:1: [sdi]  Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE

Jan  7 10:45:04 svr440 kernel: sd 9:0:0:1: [sdi]  Sense Key : Illegal Request [current]

Jan  7 10:45:04 svr440 kernel: sd 9:0:0:1: [sdi]  <<vendor>> ASC=0x94 ASCQ=0x1ASC=0x94 ASCQ=0x1

Jan  7 10:45:04 svr440 kernel: sd 9:0:0:1: [sdi] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 0e ff ff 18 00 00 08 00

Jan  7 10:45:04 svr440 kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev sdi, sector 251658008

 
Any ideas?
0
paul williams
Asked:
paul williams
1 Solution
 
MazdajaiCommented:
Have you run check disk on your hard disks to confirm they are not failing or have bad sectors?
0
 
DavidPresidentCommented:
Do you have a PERC RAID controller? If so the error indicates a problem with multipathing configuration  when trying to read 512KB from the indicated offset.  Did something physically get moved, and/or are you running multiple paths?  


You need to report more of the log.  It does NOT indicate a HDD failure. If you had a HDD read error then the sense key would not be "Illegal request", and ASCQ would not be 0x94.    It is as if you're trying to read from a location that doesn't exist, either because the disk is not addressed where the controller expects it to be, or the offset is greater than the capacity of the drive.

P.S. the LAST thing you want to do is a check disk (fsck)  as another author suggested.  It will likely result in 100% data loss.
0
 
paul williamsAuthor Commented:
Yes, I was a little dubious about running an fsck for now.

Good news that its not a HDD failure.
VM server is running on a  SunX3-2 (X86) and connected to an Oracle Storage 2540-M2 storage array.

Im wondering whether something has changed on the set up. Its not been working for a while apparently but I've only just picked this up.
0
Improve Your Query Performance Tuning

In this FREE six-day email course, you'll learn from Janis Griffin, Database Performance Evangelist. She'll teach 12 steps that you can use to optimize your queries as much as possible and see measurable results in your work. Get started today!

 
nociSoftware EngineerCommented:
the errors seem to indicate a multipathing issue as was said before.
Disk errors would have shown up a problems with MEDIA and/or Addressing sectors/tracks.

Can you verify the multipath configuration of your system
0
 
paul williamsAuthor Commented:
Hmm. Got reply from oracle on this :-

I can see the "Buffer I/O error" are generated by active ghost devices.
===========
$ grep "Buffer I/O error" var/log/messages | sort -k11| awk '{print $11}'|uniq
sdb,
sdd,
sdf,
sdi,
sdk,
sdm,

$ grep ghost sos_commands/devicemapper/multipath_-v4_-ll | sort -k2
`- 7:0:0:0 sdb 8:16 active ghost running
`- 7:0:0:2 sdd 8:48 active ghost running
`- 7:0:0:4 sdf 8:80 active ghost running
`- 9:0:0:1 sdi 8:128 active ghost running
`- 9:0:0:3 sdk 8:160 active ghost running
`- 9:0:0:5 sdm 8:192 active ghost running
7:0:0:0 sdb 8:16 -1 undef ghost SUN,LCSM100_F running
7:0:0:2 sdd 8:48 -1 undef ghost SUN,LCSM100_F running
7:0:0:4 sdf 8:80 -1 undef ghost SUN,LCSM100_F running
9:0:0:1 sdi 8:128 -1 undef ghost SUN,LCSM100_F running
9:0:0:3 sdk 8:160 -1 undef ghost SUN,LCSM100_F running
9:0:0:5 sdm 8:192 -1 undef ghost SUN,LCSM100_F running
===========

Which is not harmful so, can be ignored. Refer Doc ID 1464587.1 for more information.
0
 
paul williamsAuthor Commented:
I've requested that this question be closed as follows:

Accepted answer: 0 points for paul williams's comment #a40539683

for the following reason:

Advice from Oracle support.
0
 
nociSoftware EngineerCommented:
Those messages were not included in the snippet.
So how could we check for that fact?

still the advice you need to review the multipath setup is a valid one.
In this case there were more messages indicating that those were just warnings.

So it would be fair imho that you award some points.
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Free Tool: Path Explorer

An intuitive utility to help find the CSS path to UI elements on a webpage. These paths are used frequently in a variety of front-end development and QA automation tasks.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now