?
Solved

Reverting schema change from 69 (2012 R2) back to 47 (2008 R2). Forest restore question

Posted on 2015-01-16
5
Medium Priority
?
208 Views
Last Modified: 2015-01-21
Hello,
If we do Authoritative Restore for FSMO holders for each domains, dont they suppose to replicate changes to the remaining DCs? Why Microsoft is saying that you will need to restore the remaining DCs?

So, if we are trying to revert the schema change from 69 (2012 R2) back to 47 (2008 R2), would it be sufficient  to restore Schema and FSMO holders for each domain and then replicate the changes??? Or we would need to restore all the remaining  DCs? Would it be sufficient to Authoritatively restore only schema partition on the Schema master and replicate the changes??

Please advise.
P.S
I have read all MS documentation already. Need someone to post it from experience.
0
Comment
Question by:creative555
  • 2
  • 2
5 Comments
 
LVL 57

Expert Comment

by:Mike Kline
ID: 40553862
Full forest recovery to reverse it,  did you run into issues where you need to do this or are you just trying to plan?

Thanks

Mike
0
 
LVL 61

Expert Comment

by:Cliff Galiher
ID: 40553874
The issue is with how schema changes specifically are distributed and applied on a per-DC basis. The architecture was designed to be non-destructive. It isn't like the DC can just receive an entire new schema and destroy the old one. Such an act would not only be destructive, but would break the mappings of the actual objects in the LDAP database with their respective definitions.

As such, when restoring a DC with a different schema, changes are always additive, never destructive. Thus you can't restore a DC (even a schema master) and have it push out an older version. It simply can't work that way. An authoritative restore involves marking objects as authoritative, not schemas.

So if you find you have to revert a schema (which is *EXCEEDINGLY RARE*), you do have to restore all DCs.  Schemas are backwards compatible, however, so as I have now hinted at many times, having a newer schema with older DCs is perfectly acceptable and rolling back should not be required except in the most dire of DR scenarios.

-Cliff
0
 

Author Comment

by:creative555
ID: 40554322
Very good answer. YEs. we are doing it for the documentation purposes and testing it in the lab.
SO, I understand that we need to recover forest and will be doing restoring FSMO master and the remaining DCs.
So, when doing authoritative restore of FSMO master with ntdsutil, do we need to restore all partitions?? or just schema partition??
0
 

Author Comment

by:creative555
ID: 40554337
so for 2003 it would be the following command:
authoritative restore: restore database

and for the 2008 FSMO DC it would be all partitions?

NTDS-Schemapartitionrestore.jpg
0
 
LVL 61

Accepted Solution

by:
Cliff Galiher earned 2000 total points
ID: 40554369
In most cases you'll need to restore all partitions. While the schema partition holds the actual schema, once run most objects are touched (if even to full null values for various schema properties) and as such, just restoring the schema has a very high risk of leaving AD objects in an unsupported state that the OS may interpret as corruption.
0

Featured Post

Creating Active Directory Users from a Text File

If your organization has a need to mass-create AD user accounts, watch this video to see how its done without the need for scripting or other unnecessary complexities.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

How to deal with a specific error when using the Enable-RemoteMailbox cmdlet to create a mailbox in the cloud-based service, for an existing user in an on-premises Active Directory.
Transferring FSMO roles is done when an admin wants to split roles between certain Domain Controllers or the Domain Controller holding the Roles has been forcefully demoted using dcpromo / forceremoval
Attackers love to prey on accounts that have privileges. Reducing privileged accounts and protecting privileged accounts therefore is paramount. Users, groups, and service accounts need to be protected to help protect the entire Active Directory …
Are you ready to implement Active Directory best practices without reading 300+ pages? You're in luck. In this webinar hosted by Skyport Systems, you gain insight into Microsoft's latest comprehensive guide, with tips on the best and easiest way…
Suggested Courses

594 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question