Improve company productivity with a Business Account.Sign Up

x
?
Solved

Sybase 2 MS SQL migration/conversion

Posted on 2015-02-04
4
Medium Priority
?
235 Views
Last Modified: 2015-02-09
I am working with an organization that has an application with a Sybase database.  The vendor of that software has changed the database to MS SQL.  Initially, the vendor made a big deal about the migration/conversion process.  Since it's the same vendor, I'm thinking that it should not be a big deal.  When I asked them what migration tool they are using, they said that they are using straight SQL.

Does that mean that in the development of the new MS SQL database, they used the tables in the entity relationship diagram of the Sybase database, and mapped the new database tables in the MS SQL database, and they used SQL to "transfer" the fields to the new database?  ... and as such the migration or the conversion, should be easy with any major problems?

Thank you.
0
Comment
Question by:DigitalCro
  • 2
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 50

Expert Comment

by:Paul
ID: 40590254
There are substantial similarities between Sybase and MSSQL
In 1987 Microsoft and Sybase started a partnership to build/sell a Database Management System
SQL MythBusters – "SQL Server is really a Sybase product not a Microsoft one."

And there are Microsoft utilities to assist in converting from Sybase to SQL Server: SQL Server Migration Assistant (SSMA)

But I'm not confident I can offer a definite opinion about "is it simple" for a specific migration that I know so little about.
0
 

Author Comment

by:DigitalCro
ID: 40595632
Thank you for your input.

Can you provide some information about the "straight SQL" aspect.  What would that mean?

Thank you.
0
 
LVL 50

Accepted Solution

by:
Paul earned 2000 total points
ID: 40596246
There isn't, so far as I know, a precise definition of "straight sql".

 It excludes any non-sql approaches or software, but allows anything that is permitted in SQL (queries, procedures, functions, inserts, updates). It MIGHT exclude "procedural" SQL extensions (e.g. using cursors) depending on the author and context, but here I cannot tell, but using cursors really doesn't matter overall.

Basically it just means they have used SQL and not some proprietary ETL (Extract Transform Load) product.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:DigitalCro
ID: 40599246
Thank you.

You are the best !
0

Featured Post

What Kind of Coding Program is Right for You?

There are many ways to learn to code these days. From coding bootcamps like Flatiron School to online courses to totally free beginner resources. The best way to learn to code depends on many factors, but the most important one is you. See what course is best for you.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Recently we ran in to an issue while running some SQL jobs where we were trying to process the cubes.  We got an error saying failure stating 'NT SERVICE\SQLSERVERAGENT does not have access to Analysis Services. So this is a way to automate that wit…
Microsoft provides a rich set of technologies for High Availability and Disaster Recovery solutions.
This video shows how to set up a shell script to accept a positional parameter when called, pass that to a SQL script, accept the output from the statement back and then manipulate it in the Shell.
Using examples as well as descriptions, and references to Books Online, show the different Recovery Models available in SQL Server and explain, as well as show how full, differential and transaction log backups are performed

595 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question